Love and the Necessity of the Trinity: An A Posteriori Argument

Religions 12 (11):1-25 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article aims to provide an a posteriori argument from love for the Trinity. A reformulation of the argument from love is made by proposing a novel version of the argument that is situated within an objective, empirical, natural theological framework. Reformulating the argument in this specific manner will enable it to ward of an important objection that is often raised against it, and ultimately render this argument of great use in establishing the necessity of the Trinity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-11

Downloads
3,726 (#2,311)

6 months
757 (#1,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua R. Sijuwade
London School of Theology

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Summa Theologiae (1265-1273).Thomas Aquinas - 1911 - Edited by Fathers of the English Dominican Province.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references