Implicit Definability in Arithmetic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (3):329-339 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider implicit definability over the natural number system $\mathbb{N},+,\times,=$. We present a new proof of two theorems of Leo Harrington. The first theorem says that there exist implicitly definable subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ which are not explicitly definable from each other. The second theorem says that there exists a subset of $\mathbb{N}$ which is not implicitly definable but belongs to a countable, explicitly definable set of subsets of $\mathbb{N}$. Previous proofs of these theorems have used finite- or infinite-injury priority constructions. Our new proof is easier in that it uses only a nonpriority oracle construction, adapted from the standard proof of the Friedberg jump theorem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-30

Downloads
54 (#443,153)

6 months
13 (#259,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mass problems and density.Stephen Binns, Richard A. Shore & Stephen G. Simpson - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (2):1650006.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mass problems and hyperarithmeticity.Joshua A. Cole & Stephen G. Simpson - 2007 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 7 (2):125-143.
Jump embeddings in the Turing degrees.Peter G. Hinman & Theodore A. Slaman - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):563-591.

Add more references