Tools evolve: The artificial selection and evolution of paleolithic stone tools

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):419-419 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I claim that the increase in complexity in the trace of Paleolithic stone tools can be parsimoniously explained by postulating the emergence of effective mechanisms for the social transmission of representations. I propose that Paleolithic tools, similar to more contemporary tools, were subject to a process of evolution by artificial selection based on functionality

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artifacts and cognition: Evolution or cultural progress?Bruce Bridgeman - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):403-403.
Theory? Or tools for social selection?K. Richardson - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (3):579-581.
Tools as “petrified memes”: A duality.Carsten Korth - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
Is symmetry of stone tools merely an epiphenomenon of similarity?J. B. Derēgowski - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):406-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#310,411)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references