Four Concepts of Freewill: Two of them incoherent

Abstract

The discussion below could be extended by pointing out that there is a fifth notion of freedom which refers to what you are free to do within a context of a game, a system of laws, a moral regime etc. This notion of freedom is close to the notion of permission. It is worth noting that the law may forbid something without enforcing that proscription. So many people constantly do what they are not free to do in this sense.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,317

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Moral responsibility, freedom, and compulsion.Robert N. Audi - 1974 - American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (1):1-14.
The Bounds of freedom.Galen Strawson - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 441-460.
Compatibilist alternatives.Joseph Keim Campbell - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):387-406.
Libet and the case for free will scepticism.Tim Bayne - 2011 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science. New York: OUP/British Academy.
Inquiry and the Problem of Freedom.Alexander Knopf - 1980 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Freedom and Criticism: An Account of Free Action.Paul H. Benson - 1984 - Dissertation, Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
28 (#789,065)

6 months
3 (#1,464,642)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Sloman
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references