Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: epistemological obstacles as institutions

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (3):465-487 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses a series of hybridization experiments carried out by Nils Herman Nilsson-Ehle between 1900 and 1907 at a plant breeding station in Svalöf, Sweden. Since the late 1880s, the Svalöf station had been renowned for its ‘scientific’ breeding methods, which basically consisted of an elaborate system of record-keeping through which the offspring of individual plants were traced over generations while being meticulously described. This record system corresponded to a certain breeding technique and certain theoretical convictions . Inspired by Tschermack’s translation of Mendel’s Pisum-paper, Nilsson-Ehle began his experiments in 1900 and published a first, major synthesis of his findings in 1908. If one compares these experiments as documented in the breeding records, with their representations in print, one encounters discrepancies in terms of procedure and presentation of data. This can be explained by the fact that Nilsson-Ehle was obliged to follow the recording and breeding procedures institutionalised at Svalöf, and these procedures, grounded in a taxonomic discourse, left little room for Mendelian hybridisation experiments. The twists and turns that this story takes are analysed in terms of Bachelardian philosophy of science, where the ‘epistemological obstacle’ functions as a central, analytic category. In contrast to Bachelard, however, I will characterise these obstacles as being of an institutional, rather than mental, nature. Thus characterized, moreover, they turn out to have been prerequisites as much as barriers to scientific progress

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: epistemological obstacles as institutions.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (3):465-487.
The curious case of blending inheritance.Theodore M. Porter - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):125-132.
Constant Hybrids in Mendel's Research.Vitěszslav Orel & Vitězslav Orel - 1998 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 20 (3):291 - 299.
The plant breeding industry after pure line theory: Lessons from the National Institute of Agricultural Botany.Dominic Berry - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):25-37.
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
Practical animal breeding as the key to an integrated view of genetics, eugenics and evolutionary theory: Arend L. Hagedoorn.Bert Theunissen - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):55-64.
Evolution Made to Order: Plant Breeding and Technological Innovation in Twentieth- Century America.Edmund Russell - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 65:26-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
86 (#240,903)

6 months
14 (#214,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Staffan Müller-Wille
Universität Zu Lübeck

Citations of this work

Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: from nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):796-806.
Towards a philosophy of microbiology.Maureen A. O’Malley & John Dupré - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):775-779.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations