Co je podle Wittgensteina řeč?

Studia Neoaristotelica 5 (1):38-50 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author shows that, after some considerations about the nature of speech, we can take two substantially different paths. Wittgenstein’s early philosophy is the paradigm of the first path, his later the paradigm of the second. According the author, the difference between these two conceptions is that in the late Wittgenstein, as opposed to his early conception, rejects the search for, and the clarification of, the essence of our language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dvojí pohled na Tomášův traktát o Trojici.Prokop Sousedík - 2019 - Studia Neoaristotelica 16 (5):79-108.
Wittgenstein, Ethics and Philosophical Clarification.Oskari Kuusela - 2017 - In Reshef Agam-Segal & Edmund Dain (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought. New York: Routledge. pp. 37-65.
Wittgenstein’s Metaphysics.John W. Cook - 1994 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Vorwort.Stanislav Sousedík - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1-2):6-9.
Film as Philosophy: The Wittgenstein Case.Marko Kardum - 2020 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 40 (4):665-684.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
52 (#422,121)

6 months
16 (#194,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references