Dialogue at the Limit of Phenomenology

Chiasmi International 11:145-156 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I highlight the importance of the phenomenon of living speech and the communicative dimension of experience in phenomenological research. Specifically, I critically consider the charge of phonocentrism raised by Derrida to phenomenology which appears to have discredited any attempt to approach the phenomenon of vocality for fear of falling back into a metaphysics of presence and adopting the stance of atomistic subjectivity. It may be true that classical phenomenology of consciousness privileges the first person point of view and is guilty of a subjectivist bias but one finds rich resources within the dialogical tradition, notably Buber, as well as in the works of Humboldt and Plato's Dialogues, which highlight a fundamental duality of self and the other, which plays out between You and I within living speech, and to thus correct the invidualist position of classical phenomenology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Doing Truth.Patrizia Manganaro - 2023 - Critical Hermeneutics 6 (2).
Husserl’s Notion of Solitary Speech Reconsidered: In Conversation with Vygotsky.Kyong E. Lee - 2024 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 55 (4):341-358.
Derrida and Husserl on Time.Luke Fischer - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (2):345-357.
Feminist phenomenological voices.Linda Fisher - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):83-95.
Per una fenomenologia critica della gravidanza.Nicole Miglio - 2021 - Chiasmi International 23:153-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
627 (#42,323)

6 months
166 (#23,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beata Stawarska
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references