Guinea Pig Duties: 3. The Nature of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research

Research Ethics 1 (3):84-89 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a series of articles, I argue for a different relationship between investigators and subjects of clinical research – one that is based on partnership in shared aims. This would require significant behavioural change since any relationship of this nature requires each partner to recognise their duties within it. This third essay examines the duties that would fall on patients in this partnership.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610500100303

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
Guinea Pig Duties: 2. The Origin of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (2):45-52.
Guinea Pig Duties: 5. Coercion and Inducement into Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (1):3-9.
Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91.
Guinea Pig Duties: 1. The Need for Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (1):13-22.
Do patients have duties?H. M. Evans - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):689-694.
Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
Think Pragmatically: Investigators’ Obligations to Patient-Subjects When Research is Embedded in Care.Stephanie R. Morain & Emily A. Largent - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (8):10-21.
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.David B. Resnik - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:16-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
18 (#1,090,118)

6 months
3 (#1,467,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.

View all 19 references / Add more references