- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Boxdot Conjecture and the Generalized McKinsey Axiom
Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (3):630-641 (2018)
Abstract
The Boxdot Conjecture is shown to hold for a novel class of modal systems. Each system in this class is K plus an instance of a natural generalization of the McKinsey axiom. [Note from the editors: This paper was accepted for publication in 2011. It should have been published in 2014. The lateness of the appearance of the article is due entirely to an editorial oversight.]Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Partial Confirmation of a Conjecture on the Boxdot Translation in Modal Logic.Rohan French & Lloyd Humberstone - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:56-61.
The Boxdot Conjecture and the Language of Essence and Accident.Christopher Steinsvold - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Logic 10:18-35.
An Investigation of the Properties of the Mckinsey Axiom.Xiaoping Wang - 1991 - Dissertation, Tulane University
Cluster expansion and the boxdot conjecture.Emil Jeřábek - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (6):608-614.
The McKinsey Axiom on Weakly Transitive Frames.Qian Chen & Minghui Ma - forthcoming - Studia Logica:1-24.
The McKinsey axiom is not compact.Xiaoping Wang - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1230-1238.
The McKinsey axiom is not canonical.Robert Goldblatt - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):554-562.
Completeness and Definability in the Logic of Noncontingency.Evgeni E. Zolin - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (4):533-547.
On the Consistency of a Positive Theory.Olivier Esser - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):105-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-04
Downloads
37 (#607,693)
6 months
18 (#160,410)
2018-08-04
Downloads
37 (#607,693)
6 months
18 (#160,410)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
The Boxdot Conjecture and the Language of Essence and Accident.Christopher Steinsvold - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Logic 10:18-35.
The McKinsey–Lemmon logic is barely canonical.Robert Goldblatt & Ian Hodkinson - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Logic 5:1-19.
Partial Confirmation of a Conjecture on the Boxdot Translation in Modal Logic.Rohan French & Lloyd Humberstone - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:56-61.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2