Practice, semiotics, and the limits of philosophy

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (1):73-80 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article, with those published here by Robert Innis and Richard Shusterman, is part of a symposium devoted to exploring critically new directions in, and for, pragmatism. Each symposiast takes up this task in the context of new books by the other two. Accordingly, I examine the ways in which _Pragmatism and the Forms of Sense by Innis and _Surface and Depth by Shusterman may advance commitments to pluralism (such that the books that speak to one person may not address or be alive or be instrumental for another person); time and finitude (such that change, precariousness, and difference are ineliminable, and that theorizing is always situated and provincial); and, practice (such that beliefs are habits of meaning-full, meaning-giving, embodied action). I argue, following the lines of thought set forth in my _Pragmatism, Postmodernism, and the Future of Philosophy, that these commitments as well as the practice of philosophy are thoroughly political in two specified senses -- a point that signals the deflation of theory and marks the limit of philosophy -- the enabling limit of philosophy that is honest and self-critically political and politically critical

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
248 (#107,424)

6 months
17 (#179,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John J. Stuhr
Emory University

Citations of this work

A pragmatic approach to the identity of works of art.Julie C. van Camp - 2006 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20 (1):42-55.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references