Depo‐provera: Loopholes and Double Standards

Hastings Center Report 17 (5):3-4 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3562660

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Depo‐Provera: Contraceptive Risk?Allan Rosenfield - 1980 - Hastings Center Report 10 (2):4-4.
Depo‐Provera and Contraceptive Risk: A Case Study of Values in Conflict.Carol Levine - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (4):8-11.
Depo‐provera in the First World.Robert T. McDonough - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (4):44-44.
Double‐Mindedness.David McCurdy - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (2):2-3.
Standards of Care.Alvin Novik - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (4):40-41.
Standards of care-reply.G. Annas - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (4):41-41.
Toward universal standards.John E. Jesus - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (3):8.
Plan B and the Doctrine of Double Effect.Rebecca Stangl - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (4):21-25.
Registering Baby: Politics or Professional Standards?Alfred Hexter - 1980 - Hastings Center Report 10 (4):4-25.
New Standards for Gene Synthesis Screening.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (1):3-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#1,204,707)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references