- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Incorporeality
In Charles Taliaferro & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 292–299 (1997)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Arguments for Divine Incorporeality Arguments Against Divine Incorporeality The Immanence of God Works cited.
incorporeality traditional forms of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam ‐ conceiving God as an immaterial, nonphysical reality If “the incorporeality of God” means denial that God is physical ‐ then monotheistic religions accept incorporeality of God the claim that God is incorporeal ‐ meaning that God is not material arguments for divine incorporeality “Perfect goodness” ‐ analyzed as supreme value or maximal excellence arguments for divine incorporeality ‐ that a material God would either limit God‐self or entirely eclipse creation divine incorporeality, appeal to religious experience ‐ that God is said to be beyond all created, material form
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Divine incorporeality.Charles Taliaferro - 2003 - In Paul Copan & Paul Moser (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Routledge. pp. 240.
Incorporeality.Joshua Hoffman & Gary S. Rosenkrantz - 2018 - In Tim Mawson (ed.), The Divine Attributes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 39–74.
Where are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles.Patricia Curd - 2013 - In Joe McCoy & Charles H. Kahn (eds.), Early Greek philosophy: the Presocratics and the emergence of reason. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. pp. 113-138.
What we can say about God.T. M. Rudavsky - 2010-02-12 - In Steven Nadler (ed.), Maimonides. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 36–60.
Incorporeality: The ghostly body of metaphysics.Claire Colebrook - 2000 - Body and Society 6 (2):25--44.
Omnipresence and Incorporeality: GRACE M. DYCK.Grace M. Dyck - 1977 - Religious Studies 13 (1):85-91.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
12 (#1,372,094)
6 months
4 (#1,252,858)
2023-06-15
Downloads
12 (#1,372,094)
6 months
4 (#1,252,858)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Index.Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 257–270.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2