Corporate Social Resposonsibility w kontekście imperatywu kategorycznego Kanta

Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 19 (1):7-19 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, especially his categorical imperative, is one of several ethical theories mainly used to morally legitimize actions, referred to as Corporate Social Responsibility. The aim of the current article is to evaluate if Kant’s philosophy can be used as the ethical foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility as well as to present its advantages and disadvantages in a theoretical and practical approach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,810

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate social responsibility, collaboration and depoliticisation.Charles Barthold - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (4):393-403.
Responsibility, ethics, and legitimacy of corporations.Jacob Dahl Rendtorff - 2009 - Portland, OR: International Specialized Book Services [distributor].

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-01

Downloads
8 (#1,595,381)

6 months
4 (#1,262,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation.Th E. Hill - 1971 - Kant Studien 62 (1-4):55-76.
A Kantian approach to codes of ethics.Jacquie L'Etang - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):737 - 744.

View all 9 references / Add more references