The swap of integral and limit in constructive mathematics

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (5):533-540 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Integration within constructive, especially intuitionistic mathematics in the sense of L. E. J. Brouwer, slightly differs from formal integration theories: Some classical results, especially Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, have tobe substituted by appropriate alternatives. Although there exist sophisticated, but rather laborious proposals, e.g. by E. Bishop and D. S. Bridges , the reference to partitions and the Riemann-integral, also with regard to the results obtained by R. Henstock and J. Kurzweil , seems to give a better direction. Especially, convergence theorems can be proved by introducing the concept of “equi-integrability”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
37 (#678,054)

6 months
7 (#624,698)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Über die Neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik.Hermann Weyl - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1):81-82.
Lebesgue Convergence Theorems and Reverse Mathematics.Xiaokang Yu - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (1):1-13.
Constructive algebraic integration theory.Bas Spitters - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):380-390.
Classifying Dini's Theorem.Josef Berger & Peter Schuster - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):253-262.

Add more references