- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):308-310 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Three Measures of Explanatory Power with Axiomatic Representations.Michael P. Cohen - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1077-1089.
Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.James A. Hampton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):290 - 291.
Disentangling the order effect from the context effect: Analogies, homologies, and quantum probability.Elias L. Khalil - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):293 - 294.
Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):112-123.
The Conjunction Fallacy: Confirmation or Relevance?WooJin Chung, Kevin Dorst, Matthew Mandelkern & Salvador Mascarenhas - forthcoming - Thinking and Reasoning.
Is the conjunction fallacy tied to probabilistic confirmation?Jonah N. Schupbach - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):13-27.
Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
Quantum probability and comparative cognition.Randolph C. Grace & Simon Kemp - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):287-287.
Grounding quantum probability in psychological mechanism.Bradley C. Love - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):296-296.
Processes models, environmental analyses, and cognitive architectures: Quo vadis quantum probability theory?—ERRATUM.Julian N. Marewski & Ulrich Hoffrage - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):463-463.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
47 (#468,638)
6 months
6 (#856,140)
2014-01-20
Downloads
47 (#468,638)
6 months
6 (#856,140)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy.Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (4):479-510.
From is to ought, and back: how normative concerns foster progress in reasoning research.Vincenzo Crupi & Vittorio Girotto - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Quantum Theory Methods as a Possible Alternative for the Double-Blind Gold Standard of Evidence-Based Medicine: Outlining a New Research Program.Tomas Veloz, Rembrandt Sprundel, Sandro Sozzo, Massimiliano Bianchi, Suzette Geriente, Lester Beltran & Diederik Aerts - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):217-225.
Quantum Theory Methods as a Possible Alternative for the Double-Blind Gold Standard of Evidence-Based Medicine: Outlining a New Research Program.Diederik Aerts, Lester Beltran, Suzette Geriente, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo, Rembrandt Van Sprundel & Tomas Veloz - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):217-225.
References found in this work
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.Jerome R. Busemeyer, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Riccardo Franco & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):193-218.
Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy.Vincenzo Crupi, Branden Fitelson & Katya Tentori - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (2):182 – 199.
The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?Daniel Osherson - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):467-477.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2