Metaphilosophy

Abstract

analogies that epistemologists have used to discuss the structure and validity of knowledge. After reviewing foundational, coherentist, and other metaphors for knowledge, we discuss the metaphilosophical significance of the prevalence of such metaphors. We argue that they support a view of philosophy as akin to science rather than poetry or rhetoric.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Metaphilosophy.Yuri Cath - 2011 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy.Paul Horwich - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Universalism as a Metaphilosophy.Michael H. Mitias - 2004 - Dialogue and Universalism 14 (10):87-101.
Metaphilosophy and Free Will.Richard Double - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Metaphilosophy and Relativism.Fiona Ellis - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (4):359-377.
Carnap's Metaphilosophy.Jan Woleński - 2003 - In Thomas Bonk (ed.), Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 27--44.
On the Domain of Metaphilosophy.Bob Plant - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (1-2):3-24.
The Metaphilosophy of Commonsense.Edward H. Madden - 1983 - American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1):23 - 36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
81 (#259,231)

6 months
2 (#1,687,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Thagard
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references