Worldwide deliberation and public use of reason online

Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is threefold: (i) to trace the idea of deliberation back in the history of philosophy and establish the link to the Kantian concept of public reason; (ii) to pave the way for rhetoric as a constituent part of public deliberation; (iii) to undertake an applied ethical approach to worldwide deliberation online. The two former aims are treated in part one of the paper, whereas the applied analysis is undertaken in part two. One important task is to demonstrate in what ways the internet as a new and powerful venue for deliberation both challenges the old theories of public deliberation, and also points in the direction of certain revisions of our basic ideas about deliberation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#411,417)

6 months
7 (#722,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Obligations in public philosophical discourse.Allen Alvarez, May Thorseth & Siri Granum Carson - 2018 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2:7-9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Democracy and disagreement.Amy Gutmann - 1996 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Edited by Dennis F. Thompson.
The Public and its problems.John Dewey - 1927 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 13 (3):367-368.

View all 12 references / Add more references