Doom soon? [Book Review]

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):243 – 252 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-07

Downloads
47 (#512,519)

6 months
8 (#497,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Torbjörn Tännsjö
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

The world destruction argument.Simon Knutsson - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (10).
Observer‐relative chances and the doomsday argument.John Leslie - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):427 – 436.
The repugnant conclusion.Jesper Ryberg - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Who are the beneficiaries?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1992 - Bioethics 6 (4):288–296.
Who Are the Beneficiaries?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - Bioethics 6 (4):288-296.

Add more references