Abortion: Three Perspectives

Oup Usa (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The newest addition to the Point/Counterpoint Series, Abortion: Three Perspectives features a debate between four noted philosophers - Michael Tooley, Celia Wolf-Devine, Philip E. Devine, and Alison M. Jaggar - presenting different perspectives on one of the most socially and politically argued issues of the past 30 years. The three main arguments include the "liberal" pro-choice approach, the "communitarian" pro-life approach, and the "gender justice" approach. Divided into two parts, the text features the authors' ideas, developed in depth, and their responses to one another within each framework. As philosophers, the authors have special skills in critical analysis and thinking systematically about values. The text is appropriate for advanced courses in ethics, bioethics, sex and gender issues, and contemporary moral issues.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-31

Downloads
391 (#70,854)

6 months
8 (#528,123)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Tooley
University of Colorado, Boulder
Alison Jaggar
University of Colorado, Boulder
Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

If Abortion, then Infanticide.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (5):387-409.
The Substance View: A Critique.Rob Lovering - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (5):263-70.
Pathocentric Health Care and a Minimal Internal Morality of Medicine.David B. Hershenov - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (1):16-27.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references