A New And Improved Argument For A Necessary Being

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):357–359 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I suggest two improvements to Joshua Rasmussen’s intriguing recent argument that a causally powerful being necessarily exists.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A New Argument for a Necessary Being.Joshua Rasmussen - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):351-356.
Why is There Anything?Joshua Rasmussen & Christopher Gregory Weaver - 2018 - In Jerry L. Walls Trent Dougherty (ed.), Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 137-156.
Anselm's Ontological Argument: Rationalistic or Apologetic?Hugh R. Smart - 1949 - Review of Metaphysics 3 (2):161 - 166.
Reverse Ontological Argument.James Henry Collin - 2022 - Analysis 82 (3):410-416.
Modal Logic vs. Ontological Argument.Andrezej Biłat - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):179--185.
The Ontological Argument.James Cargile - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (191):69 - 80.
Is Timothy Williamson a Necessary Existent.David Efird - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. qnew York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-05

Downloads
947 (#23,055)

6 months
164 (#24,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

From a necessary being to god.Joshua Rasmussen - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):1-13.
A New Argument for a Necessary Being.Joshua Rasmussen - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):351-356.

Add more references