Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “What is The Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?”

&
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):7-8 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160902918804

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative.Kathryn M. Porter, Marion Danis, Holly A. Taylor, Mildred K. Cho & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):13-15.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
The Role of Patient Perspectives in Clinical Research Ethics and Policy: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System”.Maureen Kelley, Cyan James, Stephanie Alessi Kraft, Diane Korngiebel, Isabelle Wijangco, Steven Joffe, Mildred K. Cho, Benjamin Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):7-9.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Deceive: Placebos in Clinical Practice”.Bennett Foddy - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise”.Abram Brummett & Erica Salter - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W5-W8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials”.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):W1-W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethics of Advertising for Health Care Services”.Yael Schenker, Robert M. Arnold & Alex John London - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):W3 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials”.Stephanie Morain, Debra Mathews, Juli Murphy Bollinger & Jeremy Sugarman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W9-W11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
39 (#575,001)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Back to basics in clinical research ethics.Bridget Haire - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):48 – 49.
Standard-of-care propositions should permit informative comparisons.Howard Mann - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):46 – 47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 7 references / Add more references