- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Abandoning Informed Consent
Hastings Center Report 25 (2):5-12 (1995)
Abstract
Clinicians cannot obtain valid consent to treatment because they cannot guess which treatment option will serve a particular patient's best interests. These guesses could be made more accurately if patients were paired with providers who share their deep values.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Abandoning Informed Consent?John M. Freeman, William Weil, Robert F. Berris & Robert Veatch - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (1):2.
Abandoning informed consent: An idea whose time has not yet come.Becky Cox White & Joel Zimbelman - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):477 – 499.
Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: Abandoning informed consent.L. Verheijde Joseph, Y. Rady Mohamed, Woien Sandra & McGregor Joan - 2006 - BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):14.
Organ procurement organizations internet enrollment for organ donation: Abandoning informed consent. [REVIEW]Sandra Woien, Mohamad Rady, Joseph Verheijde & Joan McGregor - 2006 - BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9.
Tackling Epistemological Naivety: Large-Scale Information Systems and the Complexities of the Common Good.Kjetil Rommetveit - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):584-595.
Free Choice and Patient Best Interests.Emma C. Bullock - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (4):374-392.
Practice variation in the informed consent procedure for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a survey among neurologists and neurology residents.Sander M. van Schaik, Renske M. Van den Berg-Vos, Bastiaan C. ter Meulen, Marieke C. Visser, Frank de Beer, Jos P. L. Slenders & Valentijn J. Zonjee - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-9.
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent: Implications for Pediatric Practice.Mark Christopher Navin & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):43-51.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
105 (#208,136)
6 months
17 (#151,358)
2013-11-22
Downloads
105 (#208,136)
6 months
17 (#151,358)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):117-124.
In Defense of “Denial”: Difficulty Knowing When Beliefs Are Unrealistic and Whether Unrealistic Beliefs Are Bad.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Peter A. Ubel - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):4-15.
Microethics: The Ethics of Everyday Clinical Practice.Robert D. Truog, Stephen D. Brown, David Browning, Edward M. Hundert, Elizabeth A. Rider, Sigall K. Bell & Elaine C. Meyer - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (1):11-17.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-xn8c5 dc2