Confucius and the Hen-Pheasant: The Enigma at the Center of the Analects

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 22 (3):351-377 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The last sentence of Chapter 10 of the Analects describes a brief encounter between Confucius and a hen-pheasant, and it does so in puzzling terms, ridden with lexical difficulties. At the same time, intertextual references insert this fragment into the context of Confucius’ life mission as well as of Chinese mythological narratives. This contribution assesses the fragment’s meaning and significance: Confucius’ reaction to the hen-pheasant unveils his evolving understanding of the Heavenly Mandate bestowed upon him. The fragment thus forcefully concludes the chapter in which it is inserted. Additionally, I put forward a hypothesis: the focus of this narrative, coupled with its positioning at the end of Chapter 10, induce us to postulate that it may have been purposefully located at the very center of the Analects, a proposition that reverberates on the way we look at the composition of the book.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-02

Downloads
38 (#622,493)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benoît Vermander
Fudan University

Citations of this work

Circling the Giant Tree: A Response to Andrew Meyer and Dennis Schilling.Benoît Vermander - 2023 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 22 (4):647-658.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Edit by Number: Looking at the Composition of the Huainanzi, and Beyond.Benoît Vermander - 2021 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20 (3):459-498.
The Emergence of the Notion of Predetermined Fate in Early China.Yunwoo Song - 2019 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18 (4):509-529.

Add more references