- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton.Frans A. J. Birrer - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):267-276.
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.
The Devil is in the Framework. Comment on Mizrahi vs. all Debate on the Strength of Arguments from an Expert Opinion.Szymon Makuła - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (4):1999-2013.
Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. [REVIEW]Robert Kimball - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19:154-156.
Douglas Walton, appeal to expert opinion– arguments from authority.Ronald Leenes - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):277-281.
Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority Reviewed by.Robert H. Kimball - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19 (2):154-156.
DOUGLAS N. WALTON, "Topical Relevance in Argumentation". [REVIEW]David Hitchcock - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):819.
D.N. Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. [REVIEW]Mark Vorobej - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (2):251-255.
D.N. Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. [REVIEW]Mark Vorobej - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (2):251-255.
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
8 (#1,613,850)
6 months
8 (#390,329)
2009-01-28
Downloads
8 (#1,613,850)
6 months
8 (#390,329)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning.David S. Watson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-33.
Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory.Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):102-128.
Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.Martin David Hinton - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):539-554.
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.
About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):27-58.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-xn8c5 dc2