Two concepts of communication as criteria for collective responsibility

Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):735 - 744 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In part one I review the literature, exposing some of the ambiguities, contradictions, and antinomies involved in the notion of communication. The literature presents us with two rather contradictory notions of communication: one rhetorical, the other responsible. Disparity between the two may be seen to jeopardize a new moral mandate to corporate business. In part two I develop more explicitly the models of rhetorical and responsible communication, locating the issue at the center of a solution to the problem of collective responsibility. A proper exercise of corporate moral responsibility, I argue, is compatible only with a model of responsible communication. I conclude by challenging top management to strive toward a goal of responsible communication at all levels in their respective corporate institutions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#481,746)

6 months
10 (#411,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Communications.[author unknown] - 1947 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 52 (2):191-192.
Communications.[author unknown] - 1938 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 45 (2):31-31.

Add more references