Must we 'always get rid of the idea of the private object'?

Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):299-317 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2010

ISBN(s)

00384283

DOI

10.1111/j.2041-6962.1989.tb00491.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Patricia H. Werhane, Skepticism, Rules, and Private Languages. [REVIEW]Rupert Read - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (2):144-147.
Patricia H. Werhane, “Skepticism, Rules, and Private Languages”. [REVIEW]Rupert Read - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (2):144-147.
Why We Can’t All Just Get Along.Graham G. Dodds - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):345-374.
Private criteria and the private language argument.Robert H. Kimball - 1980 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):411-416.
The private language argument.James D. Carney - 1971 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):353-359.
Always Himself.Robert L. Perkins - 1974 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):539-551.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
60 (#355,311)

6 months
21 (#140,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Werhane
DePaul University

Citations of this work

Concrete Concepts in Basic Cognition.Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (3):1093-1116.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references