Popper's theory of the closed society conflicts with his theory of research

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):185-209 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Popper's theory of the attraction of closed societies conflicts with his theory of research: the former sees rational thought as contrary to man's nature, whereas the latter sees it as an innate psychological process. This conflict arose because Popper developed a theory of the movement from the closed society—Heimat—to civilized society, which sees civilized society as a burden, before he adapted Selz's view of directed thought processes as problem solving, which sees rationality as natural. Rejecting the earlier view and retaining the latter one opens up possibilities for better explanations of closed societies and better means of combating them. Key Words: closed society • Popper • Selz • problems • institutions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#418,741)

6 months
4 (#1,249,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Psychoanalyzing Historicists?: The Enigmatic Popper. [REVIEW]Setargew Kenaw - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):315 - 332.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The poverty of historicism.Karl Raimund Popper - 1960 - London,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
The retreat to commitment.William Warren Bartley - 1984 - La Salle [Ill.]: Open Court Pub. Co..
The Retreat to Commitment.Neil Cooper - 1965 - Philosophical Quarterly 15 (58):72-72.

View all 18 references / Add more references