Corporate moral responsibility: What can we infer from our understanding of organisations? [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of corporate moral responsibility – whether corporate bodies can be held morally responsible for their actions – has been debated by a number of writers since the 1970s. This discussion is intended to add to that debate, and focuses for that purpose on our understanding of the organisation. Though the integrity of the organisation has been called into question by the postmodern view of organisations, that view does not necessarily rule out the attribution of corporate agency, any more than the postmodern view of the person rules out the attribution of individual agency. The postmodern view is opposed to a reifying, metaphysical view of corporate agency, but a semantic view of corporate agency would seem to sit more comfortably with it. A bigger problem for the idea of corporate moral responsibility arises from the fact that in Kantian terms organisations are not ends in themselves. In that sense they are not like persons, and this must limit their autonomy, and their responsibility. This aspect of organisations also limits their punishability. For these reasons corporate moral responsibility must be seen as more limited than the responsibility of persons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate moral responsibility in health care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Corporate responsibility and corporate personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
Corporate Accountability. Not Moral Responsibility.David Rönnegard - 2024 - Journal of Human Values 30 (1):32-37.
Group Responsibility.Christian List - 2022 - In Dana Kay Nelkin & Derk Pereboom (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zombies Incorporated.Olof Leffler - 2023 - Theoria 89 (5):640-659.
Corporate Weakness of Will.Kenneth Silver - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-17.
Corporate versus individual moral responsibility.C. Soares - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
120 (#179,949)

6 months
2 (#1,686,184)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
The Corporation as a Moral Person.Peter French - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
Why corporations are not morally responsible for anything they do.Manuel Velasquez - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1–18.
Personal Being.Charles Travis & Rom Harre - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):322.
The concept of corporate responsibility.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):1 - 22.

View all 11 references / Add more references