Harman and Others on Moral Relativism

Review of Metaphysics 42 (4):783 - 795 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IT IS NO LONGER UNUSUAL to find ethical or moral relativism defended, yet there remains some uneasiness about the position, even among its defenders. Richard Brandt, for example, who offers a version he finds "somewhat plausible," admits that he and most other philosophers "have an anti-relativist predilection, at least when we come to moral issues which are important."

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Relativism and Moral Realism.Bruce Russell - 1984 - The Monist 67 (3):435-451.
Beyond Right and Wrong. [REVIEW]G. M. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):122-122.
Moral relativism.Christopher Gowans - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
How to Be a Moral Relativist.David Phillips - 1997 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):393-417.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Relativism Refuted?R. B. Brandt - 1984 - The Monist 67 (3):297-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
51 (#434,891)

6 months
5 (#1,094,893)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references