Object-Hood and Objectification in Buddhist Philosophy: Origin and Obstacle of Language

In Manel Herat, Buddhism and Linguistics: Theory and Philosophy. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 81-99 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that language is unfaithful to reality. This idea has been explored in various ways in the literature. Interestingly, a pair of antonymous terms, viz., subjectification and objectification, has been used to explain the unfaithfulness of language. Linguistic literature basically resorts to the term “subjectification” whereas Buddhist philosophy of language employs “objectification,” in their respective efforts to clarify the relation between language and reality. These two terms mainly differ in their presumption regarding the world, viz., whether there is an objective or real world without any human intervention. Under the framework of linguistic philosophy, it is generally agreed that there is an objective world out there for human beings to explore and understand. By contrast, Buddhist philosophy of language denies such an existence but ascribes the so-called existence to the process of objectification as well as the unwarranted concept of duality. According to the Buddhist view of language, the object-hood is established through interactions between name-and-form and consciousness, neither of which enjoys real existence. Thus, object-hood is merely out of mental construction. It is object-hood, together with the concept of duality, that serves as the premise for language. Even though language system hinges upon object-hood and duality, many well-known grammatical features still pose challenges to the validity of object-hood and duality. Finally, the limitations of language, as repercussions of object-hood and objectification, are explored and exemplified. To sum up, object-hood and objectification not only create language but also confine language to the range of duality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Object(s) of Phenomenology.Thomas Arnold - 2020 - Husserl Studies 36 (2):105-122.
Being (with) Objects.Anna E. Mudde - 2017 - In Marie-Eve Morin, Continental Realism and its Discontents. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Математика как объективация.Анатолий В Чусов - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 56:69-74.
Igwebuike and Language: In search of an ontological toolbox for Igbo-African Philosophy.Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony - 2020 - Igwebuike: An African Journal of Arts and Humanities 8 (6):53-65.
Cassirer on language, objectivity, and truth.Jacob Hesse - 2024 - Continental Philosophy Review 57 (3):341-359.
Natural Name Theory and Linguistic Kinds.J. T. M. Miller - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (9):494-508.
Philosophical Contexts for Wo˘Nhyo's Interpretation of Buddhism.Jong-in Kim - 2002 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
10 (#1,509,169)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references