“Impero” e “imperialismo”. Michael Hardt e Antonio Negri nel dibattito internazionale

Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 28 (54) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of “empire” in Hardt and Negri’s political theory indicates a new postmodern sovereignty, able to lead the capital accumulation in the global market era. With the concept of “empire”, Hardt and Negri want to overtake the imperialism doctrines, considered by the two authors unable to understand correctly the global world. The aim of this essay is to clarify the conceptual contraposition between “empire” and “imperialism” offering a brief description of the international debate raised by the publication of “Empire” by Hardt and Negri, in order to present the different positions and describe strengths, contradictions and aporias.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empire Versus Multitude: Place Your Bets.Julian Bourg - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (3):97-107.
A globalist ideology of post‐Marxism? Hardt and Negri's Empire.Gary K. Browning - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):193-208.
Empire. By Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri.R. Alvarez - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (6):801-801.
Michael Hardt* Antonio Negri: Imperij (The Empire).M. Krivak - 2004 - Synthesis Philosophica 19 (1):319-324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-05

Downloads
418 (#66,440)

6 months
53 (#97,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elia Zaru
Scuola Normale Superiore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references