Ova četiri teksta prilagođena su izlaganja o knjizi Gordane Bosanac "Utopija i inauguralni paradoks", održana prigodom njezina predstavljanja.Predstavljanje se, uz raspravu, odvijalo u Klubu sveučilišnih nastavnika u Zagebu 24. listopada 2005.These four contributions are adapted talks on Gordana Bosanac’s book Utopija i inauguralniparadoks , delivered on the occasion of its presentation.This presentation took place at the Croatian University Teachers’ Club in Zagreb on 24th October2005.

Ova četiri teksta prilagođena su izlaganja o knjizi Gordane Bosanac "Utopija i inauguralni paradoks", održana prigodom njezina predstavljanja.Predstavljanje se, uz raspravu, odvijalo u Klubu sveučilišnih nastavnika u Zagebu 24. listopada 2005.These four contributions are adapted talks on Gordana Bosanac’s book Utopija i inauguralniparadoks, delivered on the occasion of its presentation.This presentation took place at the Croatian University Teachers’ Club in Zagreb on 24th October2005.

Ovaj članak propituje socijalno-političke posljedice nasljeđa jednog povijesnog totalitarističkog koncepta. Radi se o fenomenu »fašizma«. Ima li fašizam neku teorijsku, ali i praktičku aktualnost u suvremenom »novom svjetskom poretku«? S unaprijed pretpostavljenim odgovorom da je tomu doista tako, nameću se argumentacijske strategije objašnjenja same pojave fašizma u suvremenosti. Pitanje u naslovu parafrazira naslove dviju važnih knjiga. Radi se o knjizi Giorgia Agambena Ono što ostaje od Auschwitza, te o zbirci tekstova Rastka Močnika, skupljenih pod naslovom Koliko fašizma? Članak pokušava elaborirati (...) samozadanu tematiku preko problematike »biopolitike«. U tu je svrhu kao inspirativan model poslužila teorija imunizacije/imunitarnosti talijanskog filozofa Roberta Esposita. Kroz nju se pokazuje strukturna neizbježnost fašizma u okviru neo-liberalizma u njegovoj imunitarnoj paradigmi. Njegovo »količinsko« smanjenje vezano je uz politiku solidarnosti i javnog prostora .This article examines socio-political consequences of the heritage of one of the historical totalitarian concepts. It is a phenomenon of “fascism”. Does fascism have any theoretical, but also practical actuality in the contemporary “new world order”? With the pre-assumption that it is the matter of fact, certain argumentation strategies of explanation of the appearance of fascism in present days are imposed. Question in the title paraphrases titles of two important books. It is a book by Giorgio Agamben, Remnants of Auschwitz, and a collection of essays by Rastko Močnik, collected under the title How Much Fascism? This article tries to elaborate this selfimposed subject through the issue of “biopolitics”. For this purpose, as an inspiring model, the theory of immunization/immunitarity presented by the Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito is used. Through that theory a structural inevitability of fascism in the framework of neo-liberalism shows itself in the immunitarian paradigm. The “quantitative” reduction of fascism is related to the policy of solidarity and public sphere. (shrink)

Članak pokušava detektirati inicijalno pojavljivanje termina »biopolitika«. Termin, danas najčešće vezan uz filozofsku poziciju Giorgia Agambena , svoj prvi iskaz dobiva kod Michela Foucaulta. Njegova dijagnoza u sedamdesetim godina prošlog stoljeća bila je da je moć znanstveno-tehnologijske proizvodnje života stvarila razdoblje biopolitike. Biopolitika je za Foucaulta ulazak života i njegovih mehanizama u područje svjesnog računanja i reguliranja moći, odnosno znanja svih agenata promjene ljudskog života. Stanovništvo postaje predmetom političkih intervencija već od kraja 18. i početka 19. stoljeća. U savezu sa (...) standardnim institucijama disciplinarnog poretka – ekonomija, politika, vojska – konstantni je sklop biopolitike stanovništvo. S obzirom na kategoriju života kao matricu društvenosti, ovdje se utemeljuje ono što će kasnije formirati »biopolitička teorija«.The article tries to detect the initial appearance of the concept of “biopolitics”. This concept, nowadays usually linked with philosophical position of Giorgio Agamben , first came to an attention by Michel Foucault. His diagnosis in the seventies of the past century was that the power of the scientific-technological production of life created a period of biopolitics. For Foucault, biopolitics is the entrance of life and its mechanisms into the area of conscious calculation and regulation of power that is the knowledge of all the agents of change in a person’s life. The population becomes the subject of political interventions already by the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century. In alliance with the standard institutions of the disciplinary order – economics, politics, and the military – the constant framework of biopolitics is the population. With regards to the category of life as the matrix of sociability, here we have the foundation of what is later to be formed into "biopolitical theory". (shrink)