Temporal Omniscience, Free will, and Their Logic

Global Philosophy 33 (1):1-9 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking divine omniscience as including temporal omniscience, which means God exists at all times and knows everything, I point out the fallacies in an incompatibilist argument. Syntactically, due to misapplication of the principle of substitutivity, this incompatibilist argument isn’t valid. Semantically, due to cancelation of a supposition on which God’s earlier belief depends, an agent’s alternative action won’t result in falsification of divine belief. Finally, by appealing to an eternalist conception of truth of proposition about the future, I argue that what divine belief entails isn’t the necessity of an agent’s action but the action itself, and put forward a notion of conditional fatalism, which allows for human free will.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-24

Downloads
40 (#564,522)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lifeng Zhang
NanJing University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will.Robert Kane - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truth and freedom.Trenton Merricks - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (1):29-57.
Thinking About Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 2017 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references