Politics Is Hard Work: Performativity and the Preconditions of Intelligibility

Philosophy and Rhetoric 49 (4):438-458 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Language creates; it does not simply reflect. Speaking is a doing that is more than an enunciative act. To utter a sentence may be to do the thing of which one speaks. In and through speaking, we create that which we seem only to represent. These are just a few of the key insights from J. L. Austin’s groundbreaking work on linguistic performativity, a number of which have found a home in contemporary democratic theory. If from Austin we get the classic examples of performative speech acts—“I do” and “I bet”—from democratic theory, we are introduced to the performativity of utterances such as “we the people” or “I have a right”. Austin’s examples remind us that one’s status...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Austin’s Ditch.James Hersh - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:104-109.
Performative Utterances: Seven Puzzles.Robert Harnish - 2007 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 3:3-21.
Reading Austin Rhetorically.Andrew Munro - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
On Juren Habermas’s Misinterpretation of J.L. Austin.Aydan Turanl - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:237-243.
Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language.Maureen Chun & Timothy Attanucci (eds.) - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-17

Downloads
50 (#435,788)

6 months
18 (#160,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations