Results for ' auditory stimulus'

988 found
Order:
  1.  44
    Auditory Stimulus Timing Influences Perceived duration of Co-Occurring Visual Stimuli.Vincenzo Romei, Benjamin De Haas, Robert M. Mok & Jon Driver - 2011 - Frontiers in Psychology 2.
  2.  44
    Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time.J. Richard Simon & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):272.
  3.  20
    Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatability as a function of task complexity.James Callan, Diane Klisz & Oscar A. Parsons - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1039.
  4.  32
    Perceived duration as a function of auditory stimulus frequency.Austin Jones & Marilyn Maclean - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):358.
  5.  24
    Pre-attentive Mismatch Response and Involuntary Attention Switching to a Deviance in an Earlier-Than-Usual Auditory Stimulus: An ERP Study.Pekcan Ungan, Hakan Karsilar & Suha Yagcioglu - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13.
  6.  61
    Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus.Judson S. Brown, Harry I. Kalish & I. E. Farber - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):317.
  7.  42
    Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
  8.  44
    Mismatch and processing negativities in auditory stimulus processing and selection.Risto Näätänen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):764-768.
  9.  25
    Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus.J. Richard Simon, John L. Craft & A. M. Small - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):203.
  10.  24
    Startling speech: eliciting prepared speech using startling auditory stimulus.Chenhao Chiu & Bryan Gick - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  30
    Strain differences in simple operant barpress acquisition to an auditory stimulus by rats.Gordon M. Harrington - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (3):163-164.
  12.  41
    Automatic and attention-dependent processing of auditory stimulus information.Risto Näätänen - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):261-288.
  13.  26
    Stimulus Parameters Underlying Sound‐Symbolic Mapping of Auditory Pseudowords to Visual Shapes.Simon Lacey, Yaseen Jamal, Sara M. List, K. Sathian & Lynne C. Nygaard - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (9):e12883.
    Sound symbolism refers to non‐arbitrary mappings between the sounds of words and their meanings and is often studied by pairing auditory pseudowords such as “maluma” and “takete” with rounded and pointed visual shapes, respectively. However, it is unclear what auditory properties of pseudowords contribute to their perception as rounded or pointed. Here, we compared perceptual ratings of the roundedness/pointedness of large sets of pseudowords and shapes to their acoustic and visual properties using a novel application of representational similarity (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  15
    Is auditory awareness graded or dichotomous: Electrophysiological correlates of consciousness at different depths of stimulus processing.Dmitri Filimonov, Sampo Tanskanen, Antti Revonsuo & Mika Koivisto - 2024 - Consciousness and Cognition 123 (C):103720.
  15.  28
    Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.Jack Botwinick - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):348.
  16.  25
    On the form of stimulus generalization curves for auditory intensity.Eric G. Heinemann & Sheila Chase - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):483.
  17.  37
    Stimulus intensity effects between and within subjects in auditory reaction time: A variable criterion analysis.G. Robert Grice, Robert Nullmeyer & V. Alan Spiker - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (3):143-145.
  18.  18
    Three-stimulus two-choice auditory discrimination learning with blank trials.John W. Moore & Joseph Halpern - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):241.
  19.  39
    Stimulus-dependent flexibility in non-human auditory pitch processing.Micah R. Bregman, Aniruddh D. Patel & Timothy Q. Gentner - 2012 - Cognition 122 (1):51-60.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  24
    Auditory reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity, frequency, and rise time.Jeffrey L. Santee & David L. Kohfeld - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):393-396.
  21.  29
    Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.Robert G. Crowder - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (6):502-524.
  22.  35
    Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.
  23.  43
    Short-term retention of auditory sequences as a function of stimulus duration, intersimulus interval, and encoding technique.John G. Miscik, Jerald M. Smith, Norman H. Hamm, Kenneth A. Deffenbacher & Evan L. Brown - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):147.
  24.  40
    Distinct Developmental Changes in Auditory and Somatosensory N1 ERP Enhancements at Rapid Stimulus Intervals.Wright Megan, Timora Justin, Paton Bryan & Budd Timothy - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  25.  41
    Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change.Fabrice B. R. Parmentier, Jane V. Elsley, Pilar Andrés & Francisco Barceló - 2011 - Cognition 119 (3):374-380.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  16
    Auditory Pattern Representations Under Conditions of Uncertainty—An ERP Study.Maria Bader, Erich Schröger & Sabine Grimm - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    The auditory system is able to recognize auditory objects and is thought to form predictive models of them even though the acoustic information arriving at our ears is often imperfect, intermixed, or distorted. We investigated implicit regularity extraction for acoustically intact versus disrupted six-tone sound patterns via event-related potentials. In an exact-repetition condition, identical patterns were repeated; in two distorted-repetition conditions, one randomly chosen segment in each sound pattern was replaced either by white noise or by a wrong (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  18
    Sequential Processing and Stimulus Temporal Uncertainty in an Auditory Equiprobable Go/NoGo Task.Borchard Jay, Barry Robert & De Blasio Frances - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  28.  27
    Auditory apparent movement under dichotic listening conditions.Renee M. Briggs & David R. Perrott - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):83.
  29.  22
    Auditory priming of frequency and temporal information: Effects of lateralised presentation.Alexandra List & Timothy Justus - 2007 - Laterality 12 (6):507–535.
    Asymmetric distribution of function between the cerebral hemispheres has been widely investigated in the auditory modality. The current approach borrows heavily from visual local–global research in an attempt to determine whether, as in vision, local–global auditory processing is lateralised. In vision, lateralised local–global processing likely relies on spatial frequency information. Drawing analogies between visual spatial frequency and auditory dimensions, two sets of auditory stimuli were developed. In the high–low stimulus set we manipulate frequency information, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  17
    No Evidence for an Auditory Attentional Blink for Voices Regardless of Musical Expertise.Merve Akça, Bruno Laeng & Rolf Inge Godøy - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Background. Attending to goal-relevant information can leave us metaphorically ‘blind’ or ‘deaf’ to the next relevant information while searching among distracters. This temporal cost lasting for about a half a second on the human selective attention has been long explored using the attentional blink paradigm. Although there is evidence that certain visual stimuli relating to one’s area of expertise can be less susceptible to attentional blink effects, it remains unexplored whether the dynamics of temporal selective attention vary with expertise and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  27
    The Phase of Spontaneous Pre-stimulus EEG Oscillations Predicts Auditory Pattern Identification.Natalie Hansen, Matthew Wisniewski, Nandini Iyer, Brian Simpson & Assaf Harel - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
  32.  34
    Relative priming of temporal local-global levels in auditory hierarchical stimuli.Alexandra List & Timothy Justus - 2010 - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72 (1):193–208.
    Priming is a useful tool for ascertaining the circumstances under which previous experiences influence behavior. Previously, using hierarchical stimuli, we demonstrated (Justus & List, 2005) that selectively attending to one temporal scale of an auditory stimulus improved subsequent attention to a repeated (vs. changed) temporal scale; that is, we demonstrated intertrial auditory temporal level priming. Here, we have extended those results to address whether level priming relied on absolute or relative temporal information. Both relative and absolute temporal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  28
    Phasic auditory alerting improves visual conscious perception.Flor Kusnir, Ana B. Chica, Manuel A. Mitsumasu & Paolo Bartolomeo - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1201-1210.
    Attention is often conceived as a gateway to consciousness . Although endogenous spatial attention may be independent of conscious perception , exogenous spatial orienting seems instead to be an important modulator of CP . Here, we investigate the role of auditory alerting in CP in normal observers. We used a behavioral task in which phasic alerting tones were presented either at unpredictable or at predictable time intervals prior to the occurrence of a near-threshold visual target. We find, for the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  34.  30
    On the heterogeneity of stimulus and response elements in the processing of information.William C. Howell - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):235.
  35.  24
    Audio-Visual Causality and Stimulus Reliability Affect Audio-Visual Synchrony Perception.Shao Li, Qi Ding, Yichen Yuan & Zhenzhu Yue - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12:629996.
    People can discriminate the synchrony between audio-visual scenes. However, the sensitivity of audio-visual synchrony perception can be affected by many factors. Using a simultaneity judgment task, the present study investigated whether the synchrony perception of complex audio-visual stimuli was affected by audio-visual causality and stimulus reliability. In Experiment 1, the results showed that audio-visual causality could increase one's sensitivity to audio-visual onset asynchrony (AVOA) of both action stimuli and speech stimuli. Moreover, participants were more tolerant of AVOA of speech (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  31
    Spatial and Spectral Auditory Temporal-Order Judgment (TOJ) Tasks in Elderly People Are Performed Using Different Perceptual Strategies.Elzbieta Szelag, Katarzyna Jablonska, Magdalena Piotrowska, Aneta Szymaszek & Hanna Bednarek - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:427226.
    The Temporal-Order Judgment (TOJ) paradigm has been widely investigated in previous studies as an accurate measure of temporal resolution and sequencing abilities in the millisecond time range. Two auditory TOJ tasks are often used: (1) a spatial TOJ task, in which two identical stimuli are presented in rapid succession monaurally and the task is to indicate which ear received the first stimulus and which ear received the second one ( left-right or right-left ), and (2) a spectral TOJ (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37.  30
    Perception of Auditory Motion Affects Language Processing.Michael P. Kaschak, Rolf A. Zwaan, Mark Aveyard & Richard H. Yaxley - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (4):733-744.
    Previous reports have demonstrated that the comprehension of sentences describing motion in a particular direction (toward, away, up, or down) is affected by concurrently viewing a stimulus that depicts motion in the same or opposite direction. We report 3 experiments that extend our understanding of the relation between perception and language processing in 2 ways. First, whereas most previous studies of the relation between perception and language processing have focused on visual perception, our data show that sentence processing can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  38.  68
    Do Auditory Mismatch Responses Differ Between Acoustic Features?HyunJung An, Shing Ho Kei, Ryszard Auksztulewicz & Jan W. H. Schnupp - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    Mismatch negativity is the electroencephalographic waveform obtained by subtracting event-related potential responses evoked by unexpected deviant stimuli from responses evoked by expected standard stimuli. While the MMN is thought to reflect an unexpected change in an ongoing, predictable stimulus, it is unknown whether MMN responses evoked by changes in different stimulus features have different magnitudes, latencies, and topographies. The present study aimed to investigate whether MMN responses differ depending on whether sudden stimulus change occur in pitch, duration, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  14
    Auditory Target Detection Enhances Visual Processing and Hippocampal Functional Connectivity.Roy Moyal, Hamid B. Turker, Wen-Ming Luh & Khena M. Swallow - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Though dividing one’s attention between two input streams typically impairs performance, detecting a behaviorally relevant stimulus can sometimes enhance the encoding of unrelated information presented at the same time. Previous research has shown that selection of this kind boosts visual cortical activity and memory for concurrent items. An important unanswered question is whether such effects are reflected in processing quality and functional connectivity in visual regions and in the hippocampus. In this fMRI study, participants were asked to memorize a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  28
    Visual and auditory coding in a memory matching task.Larry E. Wood - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):106.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  29
    An event-related potential and psychophysical investigation of cross-modal integration of auditory and tactile stimulation at rapid stimulus rates.Hedgcoe Michelle, Timora Justin & Budd Timothy - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  42.  23
    Bimodal Presentation Speeds up Auditory Processing and Slows Down Visual Processing.Christopher W. Robinson, Robert L. Moore & Thomas A. Crook - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:395363.
    Many situations require the simultaneous processing of auditory and visual information, however, stimuli presented to one sensory modality can sometimes interfere with processing in a second sensory modality (i.e., modality dominance). The current study further investigated modality dominance by examining how task demands and bimodal presentation affect speeded auditory and visual discriminations. Participants in the current study had to quickly determine if two words, two pictures, or two word-picture pairings were the same or different, and we manipulated task (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  52
    Stimulus modality effects of forgetting in short-term memory.Don L. Scarborough - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):285.
  44.  19
    Talking to Cows: Reactions to Different Auditory Stimuli During Gentle Human-Animal Interactions.Annika Lange, Lisa Bauer, Andreas Futschik, Susanne Waiblinger & Stephanie Lürzel - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11:579346.
    The quality of the animal-human relationship and, consequently, the welfare of animals can be improved by gentle interactions such as stroking and talking. The perception of different stimuli during these interactions likely plays a key role in their emotional experience, but studies are scarce. During experiments, the standardization of verbal stimuli could be increased by using a recording. However, the use of a playback might influence the perception differently than ‘live’ talking, which is closer to on-farm practice. Thus, we compared (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  29
    Serial effects in auditory threshold judgments.William J. McGill - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (5):297.
  46.  18
    Intensity of conditioned stimulus and rate of conditioning.L. F. Carter - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):481.
  47.  63
    Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space.Marcella C. C. Velten, Bettina E. Bläsing, Thomas Hermann, Constanze Vorwerg & Thomas Schack - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:147772.
    Spatial region concepts such as “front,” “back,” “left,” and “right” reflect our typical interaction with space, and the corresponding surrounding regions have different statuses in memory. We examined the representation of spatial directions in the auditory space, specifically in how far natural response actions, such as orientation movements toward a sound source, would affect the categorization of egocentric auditory space. While standing in the middle of a circle with 16 loudspeakers, participants were presented acoustic stimuli coming from the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48.  18
    The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.Thomas Dolk & Roman Liepelt - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:396791.
    Numerous studies have shown that stimulus-response-compatibility (SRC) effects in the go-nogo version of the Simon task can be elicited as a result of performing the task together with another human or non-human agent (e.g., a Japanese-waving-cat, a working-clock, or a ticking-metronome). A parsimonious explanation for both social and non-social SRC effects is that highlighting the spatial significance of alternative (non-/social) action events makes action selection more difficult. This holds even when action events are task-irrelevant. Recent findings, however, suggest that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49.  46
    Suppression of Pitch Labeling: No Evidence for an Impact of Absolute Pitch on Behavioral and Neurophysiological Measures of Cognitive Inhibition in an Auditory Go/Nogo Task.Marielle Greber & Lutz Jäncke - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:585505.
    Pitch labeling in absolute pitch (AP), the ability to recognize the pitch class of a sound without an external reference, is effortless, fast, and presumably automatic. Previous studies have shown that pitch labeling in AP can interfere with task demands. In the current study, we used a cued auditory Go/Nogo task requiring same/different decisions to investigate both behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of increased inhibitory demands related to automatic pitch labeling. The task comprised two Nogo conditions: a Nogo condition with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  13
    Auditory stream segregation of amplitude-modulated narrowband noise in cochlear implant users and individuals with normal hearing.Alexandria F. Matz, Yingjiu Nie & Harley J. Wheeler - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Voluntary stream segregation was investigated in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners using a segregation-promoting objective approach which evaluated the role of spectral and amplitude-modulation rate separations on stream segregation and its build-up. Sequences of 9 or 3 pairs of A and B narrowband noise bursts were presented which differed in either center frequency of the noise band, the AM-rate, or both. In some sequences, the last B burst was delayed by 35 ms from their otherwise-steady temporal position. In the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 988