This article is about the use of AFL (assessment for learning), AAL (assessment as learning), and AOL (assessment of learning) while developing an assessment tool. These approaches are important in teaching and learning as they provide feedback, which is then used to improve students’ performance. While establishing assessment tools the teacher should consider the learner profile, (namely the age and level), the purpose of the assessment as well as the objectives and the assessment purpose and scoring criteria. In this article (...) readers will get information about how the teacher should give instruction, scoring keys, scoring criteria, and particularly the analysis of the assessment according to the five principles (Practicality, Reliability, Validity, Authenticity, and Washback). By using AAL (Assessment as Learning) students reflect on and monitor their progress to inform their future learning goals. (shrink)

The educational landscape is evolving, with a shift towards innovative pedagogical strategies to improve student learning outcomes. This article explores the effectiveness of scaffolded learning in secondary school English language education as a means to enhance student engagement and learning experiences. By comparing scaffolded learning with traditional teaching methods, the study aims to evaluate its impact on English language skills, student motivation, attitudes towards learning, and long-term retention and application of language skills. Challenges faced by educators in implementing scaffolded learning, (...) its influence on classroom dynamics, feedback mechanisms, inclusivity, and adaptability to diverse student needs and IQ levels will also be examined. The findings seek to contribute valuable insights to optimize English language teaching practices in secondary schools. (shrink)

The main goal of the article is to briefly review the difference between analytical and synthetic in Hegel's philosophy, as well as to determine whether this philosopher was a follower of Kant's philosophy or not. First, in the "Introduction" section, the difference between analytical and synthetic in Kant's philosophy is shown; moreover, Kant's influence on Hegel and, generally, on the period in question and the conclusions of both scientists on this issue are analyzed. In the article, the main features of (...) Hegel's and Kant's worldviews and some conclusions related to the pair of concepts in Hegel's philosophy, i.e., analytical and synthetic concepts, are examined. In the conclusion of the article, Hegel's main philosophical views are identified, and the possibility of resolving the difference between analytical and synthetic through dialectical judgment is put forward. (shrink)