Çalışmanın amacı Tanrı’ya bağlanma tarzı ile ölüm kaygısı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir.Araştırma kapsamında öncelikle konunun kavramsal incelemesi yapılarak teorik alt yapısı oluşturulmuş,ardından tecrübi verilerin istatiksel analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın uygulamaaşamasında 30-60+ yaş aralığında 416 bireye anket tekniği tesadüfi örneklem yoluyla uygulanmıştır.Araştırmada Tanrı’ya güvenli ve kaygılı bağlanma tarzları ile ölüm kaygısı arasında pozitifyönde anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir.

In the novels of Tahsin Germiyani, who stands out as a narrator and novelist, dialogue was a basic technique for artistic work. Because he used the art of dialogue in a unique way to carry out communication and understanding and to fictionalize events. Such that Tahsin Germiyani's novels are considered to fill a gap in this aspect, especially in Iraq and in the Arab world in general. What makes him important is the writers he read and was influenced by. Such (...) that when we look at his works, this effect is noticeable. Rather than a reflection, this influence manifests itself in a new and different form with internalization. The new work now contains in itself his character, is far from alienation, and becomes compatible with the culture and values of the society in which he lives. It is possible to see this situation not only in dialogues, but also in the whole structure of the work. Tahsin Germiyani has written 7 novels. However, in this study, we will focus on his three novels (al-Huznu'l-vesim, Evladu'l-Yahudiyye and Zaknemut) to reveal how the dialogue is used as a technique. After giving basic information about the concept of dialogue and Tahsin Germiyani's life and works, we will try to reveal how he used dialogue in these three novels that we will take as a field of application and his artistic connections in the storylines. Germiyani used both forms of dialogues in different stages. In his novel Zaknemut, he performed the internal dialogue mostly in the forms of monologue, pleading and reaction. While the external dialogue is mostly includedin the novel al-Huznu'l-Vesim, he used both dialogues to convey his thoughts, to effectively present his reaction and his opinionson the social phenomena in Iraqi society. Because he wanted to bring to light the mistakes and deficiencies that he saw and experienced in the society. He did this with an artistic task, by describing situations that trigger interpersonal conflict, sometimes using the inner and external dialogues of the protagonists and sometimes of the deuteragonists. One of his prominent features during this fiction is hisability to make the dialogues more vivid and permanent in the mind of the reader by using the cinema technique and to make the reader a partner in this fiction. We also witness that he makes this ability more effective by using the folkspeech. We will try to put forward the relevant issues practically within the framework of his 3 novels. (shrink)

The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of religiosity on psychological well-being via meta-analytical method. In addition, the presence of moderator variables that may cause the influence quantity which was calculated as a result of meta-analytical process, is analysed. For these aims, studies that are suitable for the criterion of choice were identified. Within this context, without applying a criterion for date, the influence quantity of 10 thesis studies were calculated, which analyse the correlation between religiosity and (...) psychological well-being, and which include the number of samples used in meta-analysis and the number of pearson correlation coefficient (r) valu. Regarding the theses included in this study, 3 (30%) of them doctoral theses and 7(70%) of them are master’s theses. The number of people in samples is 5.914, 3.848 (65,06%) of which are from doctoral, and 2.066 (34,94%) of which are from master’s theses. For the analysis of the data, CMA (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0) statistical package program was used. The publication bias of the researches covered in this study was analysed via “Funnel Plot Graphic”, “Classic fail-safe N”, “Begg and Mazumdar rank correlations” and “Egger’s regression test” statistics methods. As a result of these statistical analyses, no evidence of publication bias has been found. Heterogeneity test was conducted to identify which model is to be used in measuring the influence quantity of the researches included in the study. The Q(sd=9) statistical value for its heterogeneity was measured as 114,90 (p0,05). According to this, it was concluded that the sample groups in the studies covered in the meta-analysis did not have a moderator role in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. In addition, the average influence quantity for scientific publication types in Fisher’s z is respectively.193 for PhD, and.118 for master’s degree. The average influence quantity for these subsample groups was not considered to be statistically significant (QB=0,384; p>0,05), either. In other words, the type of publication does not play a moderator role in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. (shrink)

Araştırmada maneviyat ile saldırganlık arasındaki ilişkide merhamet ve affediciliğin aracılık rolünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın yöntemi nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel araştırmadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak “Maneviyat Ölçeği,” “Saldırganlık Ölçeği,” “Affedicilik Ölçeği” ve “Merhamet Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Örneklemin 97’si (%22,8) erkek, 327’si (%77,5) kadındır. Aracılık analizinde maneviyatın saldırganlık üzerinde toplam, doğrudan ve dolaylı etki değerleri ile bootstrap güven aralıkları hesaplanmıştır. Toplam etki yani maneviyat, merhamet ve affediciliğin analize birlikte dâhil edilmesiyle saldırganlığa olan toplam etkisi negatif yönlü = −,4498, güven aralıkları ise BootLLCI = (...) −,4972 ile BootULCI=−,0762 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Doğrudan etki yani maneviyatın saldırganlık üzerine etkisi negatif yönlü −,2867, güven aralıkları ise BootLLCI = −,6711 ile BootULCI = −,2284 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Toplam Dolaylı Etki yani merhamet, affedicilik ve merhametin affedicilik üzerinden birlikte aracılık etkisi negatif yönlü −,1631, güven aralıkları ise BootLLCI = −,2777 ile BootULCI = −,0543 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu bağlamda maneviyat ile saldırganlık arasındaki ilişkide affediciliğin kısmı aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu, merhametin aracılık rolüne sahip olmadığı, merhametin affedicilik üzerinden seri aracılık rolüne sahip olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. (shrink)