Namjera ovog teksta je pokušaj opovrgavanja Foucaultove teze o smrti autora, ali pokušaj koji ne ide smjerom analize svih relevantnih tekstova i iznošenja argumenata protiv ove teze, nego primjenjujući metodu komentiranja odabranih dijelova jednog njegovog teksta – »Poretka diskursa«. Koristeći ovu metodu nastojao sam »ispitati diskurs« u znaku pitanja opovrgava li on sam i na koji način tezu o smrti autora. Drugu točku »ispitivanja diskursa« predstavlja utjecaj osobne Foucaultove biografije na njegovo djelo, smjer koji se otvara odgonetanjem nositelja »bezimenog glasa« (...) s početka ovog teksta. Foucault je i sam priznavao utjecaj biografskih činjenica na svoj rad, odnosno, prepoznavao da se cijeli njegov rad temelji na elementima vlastitog iskustva. Završni tok analize ide u smjeru otkrivanja paternalističke mreže odnosa Foucaultovog teksta.The intention of this text is an attempt to deny Foucault’s thesis on death of the author, an attempt using method of commenting one of his texts , rather than analyzing all relevant texts and giving arguments against this thesis. By using this method of commenting, I am trying to “question discourse” by examining if and how this discourse alone denies thesis on death of the author. Other way of “questioning discourse” is the way in which Foucault’s personal biography influences his work; this direction opens by uncovering the “nameless voice” from the beginning of this text. It is Foucault himself who admits influence of biographical facts on his work, and he recognizes that his whole work is founded on the elements of his own experience. Final course of analysis goes in direction of revealing the paternalistic web of relationships in this Foucault’s text. (shrink)