Results for 'ethical review'

944 found
Order:
  1.  29
    The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes.Jessica Carniel, Andrew Hickey, Kim Southey, Annette Brömdal, Lynda Crowley-Cyr, Douglas Eacersall, Will Farmer, Richard Gehrmann, Tanya Machin & Yosheen Pillay - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (2):139-156.
    Ethics review processes are frequently perceived as extending from codes and protocols rooted in biomedical disciplines. As a result, many researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HASS) find these processes to be misaligned, if not outrightly obstructive to their research. This leads some scholars to advocate against HASS participation in institutional review processes as they currently stand, or in their entirety. While ethics review processes can present a challenge to HASS researchers, these are not insurmountable and, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  41
    Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition.Edward S. Dove & Chiara Garattini - 2017 - Research Ethics 14 (1):1-25.
    Life sciences research is increasingly international and data-intensive. Researchers work in multi-jurisdictional teams or formally established research consortia to exchange data and conduct research using computation of multiple sources and volumes of data at multiple sites and through multiple pathways. Despite the internationalization and data intensification of research, the same ethics review process as applies to single-site studies in one country tends to apply to multi-site studies in multiple countries. Because of the standard requirement for multi-jurisdictional or multi-site ethics (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  51
    Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
    This article considers the process of ethical review of research on human subjects at a very large multinational consumer products company. The commercial context of this research throws up unique challenges and opportunities that make the ethics of the process of oversight distinct from mainstream medical research. Reflection on the justification of governance processes sheds important, contrasting light on the ethics of governance of other forms and context of research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  31
    Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants.Julie Mooney-Somers & Anna Olsen - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (3-4):128-138.
    It is difficult to consider, describe or address the ethical issues particular to qualitative research without experience and understanding of the technicalities of qualitative methodologies. The Australian National Statement on the Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans charges researchers with a responsibility to demonstrate that they have the appropriate experience, qualifications and competence for their proposed research. Ethical review committees have the responsibility to judge claimed research competence. This article provides practical guidance to researchers and (...) committees on using formal qualifications and training, explicit claims of competence, and markers of in/competence to assess qualitative research competence. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  33
    Preparing ethical review systems for emergencies: next steps.Katharine Wright, Nic Aagaard, Amr Yusuf Ali, Caesar Atuire, Michael Campbell, Katherine Littler, Ahmed Mandil, Roli Mathur, Joseph Okeibunor, Andreas Reis, Maria Alexandra Ribeiro, Carla Saenz, Mamello Sekhoacha, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Jerome Amir Singh & Ross Upshur - 2023 - BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-6.
    Ethical review systems need to build on their experiences of COVID-19 research to enhance their preparedness for future pandemics. Recommendations from representatives from over twenty countries include: improving relationships across the research ecosystem; demonstrating willingness to reform and adapt systems and processes; and making the case robustly for better resourcing.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  35
    Multidisciplinary Ethics Review for Liminal Cases in Maternal-Fetal Surgery: A Model.Megan A. Allyse, Lindsay Warner, Leal Segura, Mauro Schenone, Siobhan Pittock, Abigail Rousseau & Kirsten A. Riggan - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (3):65-68.
    As members of the fetal surgery advisory board at a large tertiary care center, we read with great interest Hendriks’ et al. target article proposing a new ethical framework for fetal therap...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  4
    There Is No Ethical Automation: Stanislav Petrov’s Ordeal by Protocol.Technology Antón Barba-Kay A. Center on Privacy, Usab Institute for Practical Ethics Dc, Usaantón Barba-Kay is Distinguished Fellow at the Center on Privacy Ca, Hegel-Studien Nineteenth Century European Philosophy Have Appeared in the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Among Others He has Also Published Essays About Culture The Review of Metaphysics, Commonweal Technology for A. Broader Audience in the New Republic & Other Magazines A. Web of Our Own Making – His Book About What the Internet Is The Point - 2024 - Journal of Military Ethics 23 (3):277-288.
    While the story of Stanislav Petrov – the Soviet Lieutenant Colonel who likely saved the world from nuclear holocaust in 1983 – is often trotted out to advocate for the view that human beings ought to be kept “in the loop” of automated weapons’ responses, I argue that the episode in fact belies this reading. By attending more closely to the features of this event – to Petrov’s professional background, to his familiarity with the warning system, and to his decisions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  67
    Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?Effy Vayena, Minerva Rivas Velarde, Mahsa Shabani, Gabrielle Samuel, Camille Nebeker, S. Matthew Liao, Peter Kleist, Walter Karlen, Jeff Kahn, Phoebe Friesen, Bobbie Farsides, Edward S. Dove, Alessandro Blasimme, Mark Sheehan, Marcello Ienca & Agata Ferretti - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
    BackgroundEthics review is the process of assessing the ethics of research involving humans. The Ethics Review Committee (ERC) is the key oversight mechanism designated to ensure ethics review. Whether or not this governance mechanism is still fit for purpose in the data-driven research context remains a debated issue among research ethics experts.Main textIn this article, we seek to address this issue in a twofold manner. First, we review the strengths and weaknesses of ERCs in ensuring (...) oversight. Second, we map these strengths and weaknesses onto specific challenges raised by big data research. We distinguish two categories of potential weakness. The first category concerns persistent weaknesses, i.e., those which are not specific to big data research, but may be exacerbated by it. The second category concerns novel weaknesses, i.e., those which are created by and inherent to big data projects. Within this second category, we further distinguish between purview weaknesses related to the ERC’s scope (e.g., how big data projects may evade ERC review) and functional weaknesses, related to the ERC’s way of operating. Based on this analysis, we propose reforms aimed at improving the oversight capacity of ERCs in the era of big data science.ConclusionsWe believe the oversight mechanism could benefit from these reforms because they will help to overcome data-intensive research challenges and consequently benefit research at large. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  9. Ethics Review of Externally-Sponsored Research in Japan.Alireza Bagheri & Darryl Macer - 2005 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 15 (5):138-140.
    This survey has been designed as a multinationalcollaboration to collect data from several countries focusing ondeveloping countries. The main purpose was to elaborate thefunctions of ethics committees regarding externally-sponsoredresearch . In March 2004 a total of 89 open-endedquestionnaires were sent to ethics review committees inmedical schools, medical research institutes and hospitalsaffiliated to the public and private medical universities inJapan.Twenty two ECs replied , and among them five ECshad reviewed eleven ESR proposals in 2002-3. Five of thoseESR proposals have been (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Streamlining Ethical Review.J. Millum & J. Menikoff - 2010 - Annals of Internal Medicine 153 (10):655-72.
    The U.S. review system for human subjects research has been widely criticized in recent years for requirements that delay research without improving human subjects protections. Any major reformulation of regulations may take some time to implement. In the meantime, current regulations often allow for streamlined ethics review without jeopardizing—and possibly improving—protections for research participants. We discuss underutilized options, including research that need not be classified as “human subjects research,” categories of studies that can be exempt from ethical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  11.  19
    Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia.Liya Wassie, Senkenesh Gebre-Mariam, Geremew Tarekegne & Stuart Rennie - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-23.
    Background:Africa is increasingly becoming an important region for health research, mainly due to its heavy burden of disease, socioeconomic challenges, and inadequate health facilities. Regulatory...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  22
    Ethics review and conversation analysis.Jeffrey P. Aguinaldo - 2022 - Research Ethics 18 (4):319-328.
    In this case study, I address the procedural ethics of conversation analysis (CA) and the collection of naturally occurring mundane interactions. I draw from the challenges that emerged from the institutional ethics review of the HIV, health and interaction study (the H2I Study), a CA project that sought to identify the practices through which normative assumptions of HIV and other health conditions are produced in conversations. Consistent with CA’s preference for naturally occurring interactions, the H2I Study collected and analysed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  31
    Ethical review and the assessment of research proposals using qualitative research methods.Jeanne Daly, Mridula Bandyopadhyay, E. Riggs & L. Williamson - 2008 - Monash Bioethics Review 27 (3):S43-S53.
    The role of Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) in health research is well established. Ethics committees have the good of research participants in mind but they must also assess scientific merit including the design and conduct of studies. In this article the authors’ focus is on qualitative research method and the challenge that the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) poses for ethics committees when they assess proposals using the methods outlined in the National Statement.We set (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  9
    Principled Ethics Review: Governance Arrangements for University Research Ethics Committees.Timothy Stibbs - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (3):110-112.
    This, the third seminar organised by the AREC university sector committee, included short presentations followed by parallel workshops. These proposed and explored basic principles for ethical review in the context of current models within the university REC sector. In this report, following an introduction, each of the speakers/workshop leaders summarizes their own perspective on the issues raised and discussed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  73
    Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
    Action research has repeatedly demonstrated how it can facilitate problem solving and change in many settings through a process of collaboration which is driven by the community at the heart of the research. The ethical review of action research can be challenging for action researchers and research ethics committees. This paper explores how seven ethical principles can be used by action researchers and research ethics committees as the basis for ethical review. This paper concludes by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  54
    Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel.Abha Saxena, Peter Horby, John Amuasi, Nic Aagaard, Johannes Köhler, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Emmanuelle Denis, Andreas A. Reis & Raffaella Ravinetto - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):29.
    Ensuring that countries have adequate research capacities is essential for an effective and efficient response to infectious disease outbreaks. The need for ethical principles and values embodied in international research ethics guidelines to be upheld during public health emergencies is widely recognized. Public health officials, researchers and other concerned stakeholders also have to carefully balance time and resources allocated to immediate treatment and control activities, with an approach that integrates research as part of the outbreak response. Under such circumstances, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  17.  91
    Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers.A. A. Hyder - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):68-72.
    Background: Increasing collaboration between industrialised and developing countries in human research studies has led to concerns regarding the potential exploitation of resource deprived countries. This study, commissioned by the former National Bioethics Advisory Commission of the United States, surveyed developing country researchers about their concerns and opinions regarding ethical review processes and the performance of developing country and US international review boards .Methods: Contact lists from four international organisations were used to identify and survey 670 health researchers (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  18.  44
    Readiness of ethics review systems for a changing public health landscape in the WHO African Region.Marion Motari, Martin Okechukwu Ota & Joses Muthuri Kirigia - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-9.
    BackgroundThe increasing emphasis on research, development and innovation for health in providing solutions to the high burden of diseases in the African Region has warranted a proliferation of studies including clinical trials. This changing public health landscape requires that countries develop adequate ethics review capacities to protect and minimize risks to study participants. Therefore, this study assessed the readiness of national ethics committees to respond to challenges posed by a globalized biomedical research system which is constantly challenged by new (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19.  68
    Ethical Review of Global Short-Term Medical Volunteerism.Matthew DeCamp - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (2):91-103.
    Global short-term medical volunteerism is growing, and properly conducted, is a tool in the fight for greater global health equity. It is intrinsically ethical (i.e., it involves ethics at every step) and depends upon ethical conduct for its success. At present, ethical guidelines remain in their infancy, which presents a unique opportunity. This paper presents a set of basic ethical principles, building on prior work in this area and previously developed guidelines for international clinical research. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  20.  36
    Belief, desire, and revision, by John Collins. [REVIEW]A. Disentropic Ethic - 1988 - The Monist 71 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  13
    Ethics review, reflective equilibrium and reflexivity.Julie Morton - 2022 - Nursing Ethics 29 (1):49-62.
    Background: Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or their equivalent review applications for prospective research with human participants. Reviewers use universally agreed principles i to make decisions about whether prospective health and social care research is ethical. Close attention to understanding how reviewers go about their decision-making work and consider principles in practice is limited. Objective: The study aimed to understand how reviewers made decisions in the contexts of meetings and to understand more about how reviewers approach their work. The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  29
    Ethical Review of Animal Research and the Standards of Procedural Justice: A European Perspective.Tomasz Pietrzykowski - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (3):525-534.
    Committees established for the ethical review of research involving animals have become a widespread legal standard around the world. Despite many differences in their composition, powers, and institutional settings, they share many common problems related to the well-established standards of procedural justice in administrative practice. The paper adapts the general theory of procedural justice to the specific context of ethical review committees. From this perspective, the main concerns over the procedural aspects of the ethical evaluation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  42
    The Case against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences.Zachary M. Schrag - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):120-131.
    For decades, scholars in the social sciences and humanities have questioned the appropriateness and utility of prior review of their research by human subjects' ethics committees. This essay seeks to organize thematically some of their published complaints and to serve as a brief restatement of the major critiques of ethics review. In particular, it argues that 1) ethics committees impose silly restrictions, 2) ethics review is a solution in search of a problem, 3) ethics committees lack expertise, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  24. Biomedical ethics reviews.James M. Humber & Robert F. Almeder (eds.) - 1983 - Clifton, N.J.: Humana Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  55
    Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues.D. Hunter - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):241-245.
    Presently, there is a movement in the UK research governance framework towards what is referred to as proportional ethical review. Proportional ethical review is the notion that the level of ethical review and scrutiny given to a research project ought to reflect the level of ethical risk represented by that project. Relatively innocuous research should receive relatively minimal review and relatively risky research should receive intense scrutiny. Although conceptually attractive, the notion of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  26.  58
    Ethical Review of Health Systems Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Conceptual Exploration.Adnan A. Hyder, Abbas Rattani, Carleigh Krubiner, Abdulgafoor M. Bachani & Nhan T. Tran - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):28-37.
    Given that health systems research involves different aims, approaches, and methodologies as compared to more traditional clinical trials, the ethical issues present in HSR may be unique or particularly nuanced. This article outlines eight pertinent ethical issues that are particularly salient in HSR and argues that the ethical review process should be better tailored to ensure more efficient and appropriate oversight of HSR with adequate human protections, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The eight ethical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  27.  40
    Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic.Emilie Alirol, Annette C. Kuesel, Maria Magdalena Guraiib, Vânia Dela Fuente-Núñez, Abha Saxena & Melba F. Gomes - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):43.
    Between 2013 and 2016, West Africa experienced the largest ever outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease. In the absence of registered treatments or vaccines to control this lethal disease, the World Health Organization coordinated and supported research to expedite identification of interventions that could control the outbreak and improve future control efforts. Consequently, the World Health Organization Research Ethics Review Committee was heavily involved in reviews and ethics discussions. It reviewed 24 new and 22 amended protocols for research studies including (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  28.  23
    Ethics review, neoliberal governmentality and the activation of moral subjects.Fiona James - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (5):548-558.
    This article examines forms of subjectivation propagated through the processes and practices of ethics review in UK Higher Education Institutions. Codified notions of research ethics are particularly prevalent in the university context along with stringent institutional regulation of the procedures surrounding ethics review of research proposals. Michel Foucault’s concept of neoliberal governmentality is argued in this article to help illuminate the combination of power processes reflected in ethics review practices. These operate insidiously in accordance with a neoliberal (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  69
    Ethical review issues in collaborative research between us and low – middle income country partners: A case example.Scott Mcintosh, Essie Sierra, Ann Dozier, Sergio Diaz, Zahira Quiñones, Aron Primack, Gary Chadwick & Deborah J. Ossip-Klein - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (8):414-422.
    The current ethical structure for collaborative international health research stems largely from developed countries' standards of proper ethical practices. The result is that ethical committees in developing countries are required to adhere to standards that might impose practices that conflict with local culture and unintended interpretations of ethics, treatments, and research. This paper presents a case example of a joint international research project that successfully established inclusive ethical review processes as well as other groundwork and (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30.  25
    Research Ethics Review in Australia, Europe, and North America.Paul M. McNeill - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (3):4.
  31.  16
    Ethics review of artistic research: challenging the boundaries and appealing for care.Hugo Boothby - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (1):112-127.
    In 2019, a new national Ethics Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten, EPM) was created in Sweden. In 2020, Sweden’s Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans Act was revised, tightening this legislation, and increasing penalties for its infraction. This article draws on empirical material generated by artistic research conducted with a norm-critical contemporary music ensemble. Two of the musicians who collaborated with this research identify as disabled. Consequently, in accordance with EPM, my artistic research was subject to mandatory ethics (...). Reflecting critically on my own experience of seeking ethical approval for this artistic research project, I show how EPM’s process of ethics review enacts scientific boundary work in Sweden that privileges the interests of academic disciplines that are already well-established. As a corrective to EPM’s scientific boundary work I propose the application of an ethics of care that recognises the complex relationalities that exist between research institutions, researchers and research participants. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  63
    Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
    It is not unusual for researchers to complain about institutional review board (IRB) oversight, but social scientists have a unique set of objections to the work of ethics committees. In an effort to better understand the problems associated with ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic sciences (SBES) research, this article examines 3 different aspects of research ethics committees: (a) the composition of review boards; (b) the guidelines used by these boards to review SBES - and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  33.  26
    Guidelines for Community-based Ethics Review of Children’s Science Fair Projects.Martin Tolich - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):303-310.
    Low-level community based ethics committees staffed by teachers, parents and community representatives can readily review children’s science fair projects subject to the revision of two core assumptions currently governing children’s Science Fairs. The first part of the paper recasts the New Zealand Royal Society guidelines from its primary emphasis on risk to a new assumption, without benefit there can be no risk. Equally, this revision gives more prominence to the participant information sheet, allowing it to act as a quasi (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  18
    Ethics Review of Biomedical Research in Uzbekistan: Policy and Program Gaps.Dilfuza Aniyozova & Martin A. Strosberg - 2024 - Asian Bioethics Review 16 (4):653-661.
    We describe the national health research ethics review system of Uzbekistan and identify policy and program gaps that impede the protection of human research subjects. We find that the National Ethic Committee (NEC), functioning at the national level, is solely responsible for conducting research ethics review. There is little evidence that regional ethics committees work as intended, and there is no research ethics review at medical institutes and research centers even though they conduct CDTs (clinical drug trials). (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  25
    Ethics Review Committee approval and informed consent: an analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka.Athula Sumathipala, Sisira Siribaddana, Suwin Hewege, Manura Lekamwattage, Manjula Athukorale, Chesmal Siriwardhana, Joanna Murray & Martin Prince - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):3-.
    BackgroundInternational guidelines on research have focused on protecting research participants. Ethical Research Committee (ERC) approval and informed consent are the cornerstones. Externally sponsored research requires approval through ethical review in both the host and the sponsoring country. This study aimed to determine to what extent ERC approval and informed consent procedures are documented in locally and internationally published human subject research carried out in Sri Lanka.MethodsWe obtained ERC approval in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Theses from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  36.  37
    Research Ethics Review and Mental Capacity: Where Now after the Mental Capacity Act 2005?J. V. McHale - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (2):65-70.
    The Mental Capacity Act 2005 placed for the first time research concerning adults lacking mental capacity upon a statutory footing. However, while the legislation which regulates the inclusion of such adults in ‘intrusive research’ safeguards researchers and research participants alike some controversy remains as to its implementation. This paper focuses upon two specific issues raised by the legislation. First, what constitutes ‘intrusive’ research and whether all issues concerning research involving adults lacking mental capacity should be referred to NHS research ethics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  32
    Ethical review of innovative treatment.Donald Evans - 2002 - HEC Forum 14 (1):53-63.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38. Research ethics review committees and how they operate.Cecilia V. Tomas - 2008 - In Angeles Tan-Alora (ed.), Introduction to Health Research Ethics: Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. Philippine National Health Research System.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Research ethics review.Edward Dove - 2021 - In Graeme T. Laurie (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of health research regulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Biomedical Ethics Reviews: 1992.James M. Huber, Robert F. Almeder & Paul M. McNeill - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (1):87-89.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  14
    Ethical Review of Social Experiments.John A. Robertson - 1981 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 3 (7):10.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  34
    Ethical review of undergraduate student research in the NHS: evolution of the system could benefit us all.M. Wilkinson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e19-e19.
    One of the pressures placed upon researchers is the process of ethics review. This frequently provides considerable conflict. The process of review of student projects of little inherent risk is identical to that of their more senior colleagues. In this article I propose that we should be more tolerant of design problems within student research if the overall risk is minimal in order that the student can learn about the process of carrying out research.The frequency and content of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  35
    Ethics review and freedom of information requests in qualitative research.Kevin Walby & Alex Luscombe - 2018 - Research Ethics 14 (4):1-15.
    Freedom of information requests are increasingly used in sociology, criminology and other social science disciplines to examine government practices and processes. University ethical review boards in Canada have not typically subjected researchers’ FOI requests to independent review, although this may be changing in the United Kingdom and Australia, reflective of what Haggerty calls ‘ethics creep’. Here we present four arguments for why FOI requests in the social sciences should not be subject to formal ethical review (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  38
    The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
    There is a growing body of literature on the research ethics review process, a process that can have important effects on the nature of research in contemporary times. Yet, many people know little about what the actual process entails once an application has been submitted for review. This lack of knowledge can affect researchers and committee members' responses to the review process. Based on ethnographic research on the ethics review process in 5 countries (Australia, Canada, New (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  45. Biomedical Ethics Reviews, 1992.Gerard Elfstrom (ed.) - 1992 - Clifton, NJ, USA:
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  38
    A decent proposal: ethical review of clinical research.Donald Evans - 1996 - New York, N.Y.: Wiley. Edited by Martyn Evans.
    A Decent Proposal: Ethical Review of Clinical Research Donald Evans and Martyn Evans Centre for Philosophy and Health Care University of Wales Swansea, UK The investigation and development of modern medicines and medical technology can create numerous ethical dilemmas both for clinical researchers and research ethics committees. A Decent Proposal: Ethical Review of Clinical Research seeks to facilitate and encourage good clinical research by exploring the concerns, responsibilities, general issues and particular pitfalls associated with (...) aspects of research. It provides practical guidelines for researchers on how to improve the quality of research design, while for those appointed to scrutinise research proposals it offers advice on how to apply consistent, careful and critical reasoning to the process of assessing ethical standards. As such, it will provide invaluable assistance to clinical researchers and ethics committees alike in understanding the moral challenges posed by modern health care. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  47.  14
    An Ethical Reviews on Climate Change.Noh Hui Jeong - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 26:83-104.
  48.  8
    Research Ethics Review: Identifying Public Policy and Program Gaps.GefenasEugenijus StrosbergMartin A. - 2014 - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal 9 (2):3-11.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  56
    Institutional ethics review of clinical study agreements.G. DuVal - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):30-34.
    Clinical Study Agreements can have profound effects both on the protection of human subjects and on the independence of investigators to conduct research with scientific integrity. Sponsors, institutions, and even investigators may fail to give adequate attention to these issues in the negotiation of CSAs. Despite the key role of CSAs in structuring ethically important aspects of research, they remain largely unregulated and unreviewed for adherence to ethical norms. Academic institutions routinely enter into research contracts that fail to meet (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  50.  31
    Human Research Ethics Review Challenges in the Social Sciences: A Case for Review.Jim Macnamara - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-17.
    Ethical conduct is a maxim in scholarly research as well as scholarly endeavour generally. In the case of research involving humans, few if any question the necessity for ethics approval of procedures by ethics boards or committees. However, concerns have been raised about the appropriateness of ethics approval processes for social science research arguing that the orientation of ethics boards and committees to biomedical and experimental scientific research, institutional risk aversion, and other factors lead to over-protection of research participants (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 944