Playing fair with experiments: A reply to Pitt and Westrum

Social Epistemology 3 (1):63 – 65 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02691728908578514

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review Of Joseph C. Pitt, Heraclitus Redux: Technological Infrastructures and Scientific Change. [REVIEW]Andrew Aberdein - 2020 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7):18–22.
Reply to Ackermann.Howard Kahane - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187.
Progressive science: A response to Ackermann.Joseph Pitt - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (4):341 – 344.
Experiment as a form of thought: A response to Ackermann.Ron Westrum - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (4):337 – 339.
Playing Fair?Kathleen Gordon & Kerri O'Connor - 2010 - Ethos: Social Education Victoria 18 (3):9.
Reply to Ackermann.Ross MacKenzie & Wendy Rogers - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (1):121-122.
Robert John Ackermann, "Wittgenstein's City". [REVIEW]Britt-Marie Christina Schiller - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2):310.
The Philosophy of Karl Popper by Robert John Ackermann. [REVIEW]R. Dolby - 1977 - Isis 68:456-457.
Robert Fulton's Unpublished Memoir to Pitt: Science in the Service of Liberty.Samuel Bernstein - 1944 - Science and Society 8 (1):40 - 63.
The philosophy of Karl Popper by Robert John Ackermann.Roy Bhaskar - 1977 - Philosophical Books 18 (2):78-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
56 (#386,330)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references