Philosophy, instinct, intuition: What motivates the scientist in search of a theory?

Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):93-101 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article questions whether philosophical considerations play any substantial role in the actual process of scientific research. Using examples mostly from the nineteenth century, it suggests that scientists generally choose their basic theoretical orientation, and their research strategies, on the basis of non-rationalized feelings which might be described as instinct or intuition. In one case where methodological principles were the driving force (Charles Lyell's uniformitarian geology), the effect was counterproductive.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#352,930)

6 months
5 (#1,025,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Darwinian Revolution.Michael Ruse - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
Introduction.James A. Secord - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (4):387-389.
Organicism in Biology.Joseph Needham - 1928 - Philosophy 3 (9):29-40.
Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist.Nicolaas A. Rupke - 1995 - Journal of the History of Biology 28 (2):372-374.

View all 6 references / Add more references