- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Competence, reflective equilibrium, and dual-system theories
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):251–252 (2011)
Abstract
A critique of inferences from 'is' to 'ought' plays a central role in Elqayam and Evans' defense of descriptivism. However, the reflective equilibrium strategy described by Goodman and embraced by Rawls, Cohen and many others poses an important challenge to that critique. Dual system theories may help respond to that challenge.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Reflective Equilibrium in Rawls’ Theory of Justice: The Perspective of Holistic Pragmatism.Mihai Burlacu - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 7 (2):336-356.
Reflective equilibrium and constitutional method.Mitchell N. Berman - 2011 - In Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.), The challenge of originalism: theories of constitutional interpretation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Functional role semantics and reflective equilibrium.Simone Gozzano - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (38):62-76.
Intuitions, heuristics, and utilitarianism.Peter Singer - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):560-561.
Norms, goals, and the study of thinking.Raymond S. Nickerson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):261-262.
Alternative task construals, computational escape hatches, and dual-system theories of reasoning.Linden J. Ball & Jeremy D. Quayle - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):667-668.
Naturalizing the normative and the bridges between “is” and “ought”.Katinka J. P. Quintelier & Daniel M. T. Fessler - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266.
Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance.Bruce Edward Roig - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-11-01
Downloads
149 (#153,093)
6 months
18 (#166,022)
2011-11-01
Downloads
149 (#153,093)
6 months
18 (#166,022)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?Adam Corner & Ulrike Hahn - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3579-3610.
References found in this work
A theory of justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
Inferential competence: right you are, if you think you are.Stephen P. Stich - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):353-354.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2