Divinitia, Apostolica, Kazanistania : la guidance religieuse est-elle soluble dans le libéralisme?

ThéoRèmes 15 (15) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We compare three sub-utopias, representing various degrees of control of the religious on the civil life of a society : Rawls’s Kazanistan, May’s Apolistica and Laborde’s Divinitia. We intend to show that, contrary to what Laborde argues in Liberalism’s Religion, Divinitia cannot count, even at a low degree, as a member of the family of liberal societies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

State, Civil Society, and Classical Liberalism.Steven Scalet & David Schmidtz - 2001 - In Nancy L. Rosenblum & Robert C. Post (eds.), Civil Society and Government. Princeton University Press. pp. 26-47.
Classical Liberalism and Civil Society: Definitions, History, and Relations.Tom G. Palmer - 2001 - In Nancy L. Rosenblum & Robert C. Post (eds.), Civil Society and Government. Princeton University Press. pp. 48-78.
The conservative challenge to liberalism.Rutger Claassen - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):465-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-09

Downloads
26 (#857,659)

6 months
10 (#420,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephane Chauvier
Sorbonne Université

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Religious Democracy and the Liberal Principle of Legitimacy.Simon Căbulea May - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2):135-68.
Religious Democracy and the Liberal Principle of Legitimacy.Simonc&Abreve May & Bulea - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2):136-170.

Add more references