Mobilizing Experimental Life: Spaces of Becoming with Mutant Mice

Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7-8):129-153 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper uses the figure of the inbred laboratory mouse to reflect upon the management and mobilization of biological difference in the contemporary biosciences. Working through the concept of shifting experimental systems, the paper seeks to connect practices concerned with standardization and control in contemporary research with the emergent and stochastic qualities of biological life. Specifically, it reviews the importance of historical narratives of standardization in experimental systems based around model organisms, before identifying a tension in contemporary accounts of the reproduction and differentiation of inbred mouse strains within them. Firstly, narratives of new strain development, foregrounding personal biography and chance discovery, attest to the contingency and situatedness of apparently universal biotechnological production. Secondly, discoveries of unexpected animal litters challenge efforts to standardize mouse phenotypes and control the reproduction of murine strains over space. The co-existence of these two narratives draws attention to the importance of and interplay between both chance and control, determination and emergence, and the making and moving of experimental life in biomedical research. The reception or denial of such biological excess reflects the distribution of agencies and the emerging spatialities of the global infrastructures of biotechnological development, with implications for future relations between animal lives and human becomings in experimental practices.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mutant mice: Experimental organisms as materialised models in biomedicine.Lara Huber & Lara K. Keuck - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):385-391.
Of Mice, Medicine, and Genetics: C. C. Little's Creation of the Inbred Laboratory Mouse, 1909–1918.Karen A. Rader - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):319-343.
Of mice, medicine, and genetics: C. C. little's creation of the inbred laboratory mouse, 1909-1918.A. K. - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):319-343.
Of Mice, Medicine, and Genetics: C. C. Little's Creation of the Inbred Laboratory Mouse, 1909–1918.Karen A. Rader - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):319-343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
32 (#703,717)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Knowledge in Transit.James A. Secord - 2004 - Isis 95 (4):654-672.
Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in a Test Tube.[author unknown] - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3):563-565.
Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life.Robert E. Kohler - 1995 - Journal of the History of Biology 28 (1):167-170.
Reflexing Complexity.Brian Wynne - 2005 - Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5):67-94.
The Cyborg Embryo.Sarah Franklin - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (7-8):167-187.

View all 12 references / Add more references