Una propuesta dialógica para el debate en torno al dopaje

Agora 34 (1) (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

En este artículo se analizan los diversos argumentos en contra de levantar la prohibición contra el dopaje. A través de este análisis se concluye que ninguno de los argumentos es conclusivo por sí mismo, sino que todos y cada uno de ellos aportan un criterio normativo que ha de ser tenido en cuenta en los debates morales en torno al dopaje.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-02

Downloads
30 (#749,901)

6 months
13 (#257,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Good Competition and Drug-Enhanced Performance.Robert L. Simon - 1984 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 11 (1):6-13.
Ethics, Drugs, and Sport.W. M. Brown - 1980 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 7 (1):15-23.
On Performance-Enhancing Substances and the Unfair Advantage Argument.Roger Gardner - 1989 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 16 (1):59-73.
The Coercive Power of Drugs in Sports.Thomas H. Murray - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (4):24-30.
Doping and Cheating.Jan Vorstenbosch - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):166-181.

View all 9 references / Add more references