Neurons and Neonates: Reflections on the Molyneux Problem

In How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter looks at problems and solutions involved in Molyneux’s famous question to John Locke — whether a person born blind, if they were given sight, would be able to recognize shapes learned by touch. Traditional empiricist answers to this question are based on principles of perception that can be challenged by recent research in developmental psychology and neuroscience. A new answer to the Molyneux problem is proposed, along with a new set of principles.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do things look the way they feel?John Schwenkler - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):86-96.
Leibniz on Molyneux's Question.Brian Glenney - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
Locke on the role of judgment in perception.Walter Ott - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):670-684.
Hume and the Molyneux Problem.Henry E. Allison - 2016 - In Paul Russell, The Oxford Handbook of David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Molyneux’s question and the amodality of spatial experience.Janet Levin - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (5-6):590-610.
What was Molyneux's Question A Question About?Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen - 2021 - In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen, Molyneux's Question and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 325–344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
10 (#1,509,169)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?