Equality and Responsibility

Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How should goods be distributed in our society? Some say equally, others say according to what people are responsible for. Both ideas seem plausible but neither tell the whole story. The author examines what draws us to these two ideas and looks at recent attempts by egalitarian thinkers to bring them together in a single distributive ideal.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-31

Downloads
27 (#838,947)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Luck Egalitarianism.Carl Knight - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):924-934.
Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):507 - 519.
Individual autonomy and state involvement in health care.Thomas Rice - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (4):240-244.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references