“Unity in Diversity” Reloaded: The European Court of Human Rights’ Turn to Subsidiarity and its Consequences

The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 15 (1):93-123 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The European Convention of Human Rights system was originally created to sound the alarm if democracy was threatened in the member states. Yet, it eventually developed into a very different system with a focus on providing individual justice in an ever growing number of member states. This transformation has raised fundamental questions as to the level of difference and diversity allowed within the common European human rights space. Was the system to rest on minimum standards with room for domestic differences, or was it to create uniform standards? These questions have come up as increasingly contentious issues over the past years and have triggered a number of reforms seeking to introduce more subsidiarity in the system, striking a different balance between the European and national oversight of human rights. The article analyses this turn to subsidiarity by exploring whether the reform process has introduced new forms of difference and diversity within the common space of European human rights. Covering the period from 2000 to the end of 2019 and using a dataset of all judgments of the period, the article provides a structural analysis of developments in reference to the margin of appreciation which is the European Court of Human Rights’ long-standing tool for balancing the common standards, yet leaving space for individual member states to find local solutions to implementing those standards. It concludes that recent developments have contributed to a more federal-style construction of European human rights with more space for differences within the common general standards.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,007

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Interpretation and Appreciation. A European Human Rights Perspective on Dobbs.Martin Buijsen - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):323-336.
Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation.George Letsas - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):705-732.
Fundamental Rights: An Unsettling EU Competence.Elise Muir - 2014 - Human Rights Review 15 (1):25-37.
International human rights and national discretion.Burleigh Wilkins - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (4):373-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-15

Downloads
36 (#730,785)

6 months
11 (#400,634)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references