The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates

New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This collection provides a selection of the most essential contributions to the contemporary free will debate. Among the issues discussed and debated are skepticism and naturalism, alternate possibilities, the consequence argument, libertarian metaphysics, illusionism and revisionism, optimism and pessimism, neuroscience and free will, and experimental philosophy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Skepticism, lllusionism, and Revisionism.Part Nine - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 361.
Optimistic skepticism about free will.Derk Pereboom - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 421.
My compatibilism.John Martin Fischer - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Compatibilism: Reason-Based Alternatives.Part Seven - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 279.
Libertarian Alternatives—Soft and Hard.Part Five - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 191.
The Phenomenology of Agency and Experimental Philosophy.Part Eleven - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 471.
A Modal Argument for lncompatibilism.Peter van Inwagen - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Suggested Further Readings.Oxford Handbook ofFree Will - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-27

Downloads
931 (#23,298)

6 months
137 (#35,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Oisín Deery
York University
Paul Russell
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

"Actual" does not imply "feasible".Nicholas Southwood & David Wiens - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):3037-3060.
Arguments for incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Free Will and Moral Sense: Strawsonian Approaches.Paul Russell - 2016 - In Kevin Timpe, Meghan Griffith & Neil Levy (eds.), Routledge Companion to Free Will. New York: Routledge. pp. 96-108.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references