Science Defended, Science Defined: The Louisiana Creationism Case

Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (4):517-539 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On August 18, 1986, seventy-two Nobel laureates, seventeen state academies of science, and seven other scientific organizations submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court of the United States in which they defined and agreed upon the nature and scope of science. The brief was submitted in response to the Louisiana Balanced TreatmentAct for creation science and evolution science that had been struck down in the Federal Court of Louisiana in 1985 and was being appealed to the Supreme Court. The Louisiana trial in general and the amicus curiae brief in particular have historical significance for the history of science, being unique in the collective mobilization of scientists both in defense of and in defining science. This article describes the origin and significance of the brief.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Dayton to Little Rock: Creationism Evolves.Dorothy Nelkin - 1982 - Science, Technology and Human Values 7 (3):47-53.
Mother Teresa's Amicus Curia Brief to the US Supreme Court.[author unknown] - 1994 - The Chesterton Review 20 (4):534-538.
What is Science? What is Knowledge?Mary Gilbertson - 2003 - Teaching Philosophy 26 (2):147-161.
Why Science, Technology, and Society Studies?Carl Mitcham - 1999 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 19 (2):128-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
10 (#1,481,570)

6 months
1 (#1,894,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge.Paul Feyerabend - 1974 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Psychologie des foules.G. Le Bon - 1896 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 41:79-85.
Psychologie des Foules.G. Le Bon - 1895 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3 (6):1-1.
Commentary: Science v. Creation-Science.William A. Thomas - 1986 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 11 (3):47-51.

Add more references